Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31007513›Full record

ArticleNigerian journal of surgery : official publication of the Nigerian Surgical Research Society

Micronuclei in Exfoliated Cells: A Biomarker of Genotoxicity in Tobacco Users.

Meenakshi Upadhyay, Parul Verma, Robin Sabharwal, Santosh Kumar Subudhi, Suruchi Jatol-Tekade, Vihang Naphade, Basanta Kumar Choudhury, Pravudeva Devidutta Sahoo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nigerian journal of surgery : official publication of the Nigerian Surgical Research Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Micronuclei detection in oral cytologic smear: does it add diagnostic value?Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Meenakshi UpadhyayDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Saraswati Dental College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Parul VermaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, IDS, Sehora, Jammu, India.
Robin SabharwalDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, MMCDSR, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.
Santosh Kumar SubudhiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Suruchi Jatol-TekadeDepartment of Orthodontics, Modern Dental College and Research Center, Gandhi Nagar, India.
Vihang NaphadeDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Index Institute of Dental Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Basanta Kumar ChoudhuryDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Pravudeva Devidutta SahooPrivate Practitioner, Dental Surgeon, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Index Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre · INKamineni Institute of Dental Sciences · INSaraswati Dental College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of this study was to analyze the tobacco-related genotoxic effects in individual with habit of smoking and chewing tobacco. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe present study sample consisted of 120 individuals attending the outpatient department of D. J. College of Dental Sciences and Research, Modinagar, Uttar Pradesh (UP). The sample was divided into four groups as follows: Group I (individuals with habit of smoking tobacco), Group II (individuals with habit of chewing tobacco), Group III (individuals with habit of smoking and chewing tobacco), and Group IV control group (nontobacco-exposed individuals). Patients were asked to rinse their mouth gently with water. The exfoliated cells were obtained by scraping the buccal mucosa of individuals with a wooden spatula. The scraped cells were placed on the precleaned slides. The smears were then stained with RAPID-PAP™ and analyzed under the microscope. Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software.

resultsIn the present study, an arbitrary unit was obtained using frequency/day multiplied by the duration of years (risk multiplication factor [RMF], a positive and significant correlation were observed between the RMF and the mean percentage of micronucleated cell count in smokers, chewers, and in individuals with both smoking and chewing habit, respectively. A weak positive and nonsignificant correlation were observed between age and mean percentage of micronucleated cells in smokers and smokers + chewers, respectively, while it was weak negative and nonsignificant in chewers. In control group, correlation between age and percentage of micronucleated cells was weak positive and nonsignificant at 5% level of significance.

conclusionThe micronuclei in exfoliated mucosal cells from buccal mucosa can be used as a biomarker of genotoxicity in predicting the effects of carcinogens.

Indexed as

Carcinogensmicronucleioral cancerrisk multiplication factortobacco

Identifiers

PMID31007513
PMCPMC6452766
OpenAlexW2922102997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.