Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31007501›Full record

ArticleCognitive and behavioral practice2017

Enhancing Stress Management Coping Skills Using Induced Affect and Collaborative Daily Assessment.

Jessica A Chen, Amanda K Gilmore, Nicole L Wilson, Ronald E Smith, Kevin Quinn, A Paige Peterson, Eliot Fearey, Yuichi Shoda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive and behavioral practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica A ChenUniversity of Washington, Department of Psychology, Box 351525 Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Amanda K GilmoreUniversity of Washington, Department of Psychology, Box 351525 Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Nicole L WilsonUniversity of Washington, Department of Psychology, Box 351525 Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Ronald E SmithUniversity of Washington, Department of Psychology, Box 351525 Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Kevin QuinnUniversity of Washington, Department of Psychology, Box 351525 Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
A Paige PetersonUniversity of Washington, Department of Psychology, Box 351525 Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Eliot FeareyUniversity of Washington, Department of Psychology, Box 351525 Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Yuichi ShodaUniversity of Washington, Department of Psychology, Box 351525 Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Funding

CONSISTENCY IN SOCIAL BEHAVIORR37MH039349 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI MISCHEL, WALTER · 1989 to 2009
$4.5M
Reducing Sexual Assault Risk and Alcohol Use in College WomenF31AA020134 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GILMORE, AMANDA KATHERINE · 2011 to 2013
$126k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA020134NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH039349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to highlight the use of induced affect (IA) and collaborative (therapeutic) assessment (CA) as components of Cognitive-Affective Stress Management Training (CASMT). IA is a technique for rehearsing cognitive and physical relaxationcoping skills under conditions of high affective arousal, which has been shown to result in high levels of coping self-efficacy. CA provides diary-based feedback to clients about the processes underlying theirstress experiences and helps identify affect-arousing experiences to be targeted by IA. We include descriptions of the IA technique and anonline stress and coping daily diary, as well as sample transcripts illustrating how CA is integrated into CASMT and how IA evokes high affective arousal and skills rehearsal. To illustrate idiographic assessment, we also describe threetreatment cases involving female clients between the ages of 20 and 35 with anxiety symptoms who participated in six weeks of CASMT and reported their daily stress and coping experiences (before, during, and following the intervention)for a total of ten weeks. The resulting time series data, analyzed using Simulation Modeling Analysis (SMA), revealed that all clients reported improved negative affect regulation over the course of treatment, yet they exhibited idiographic patterns of change on other outcome and coping skills variables. These results illustrate how IA and CA may be used to enhance emotional self-regulation and how time-series analyses can identify idiographic aspects of treatment response that would not be evident in group data.

Indexed as

affect elicitationcollaborative assessmentcoping skills rehearsalstress management

Identifiers

PMID31007501
PMCPMC6474406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.