ArticleTzu chi medical journal
Is prone sleeping dangerous for neonates? Polysomnographic characteristics and NDN gene analysis.
Article in Tzu chi medical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of sleep position in term healthy newborns on sudden infant death syndrome and other infant outcomes: A systematic review.Journal of global health · 2022Pooled it
- Practical Application of Polysomnography in Infants.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Candidate genes for obstructive sleep apnea in non-syndromic children with craniofacial dysmorphisms - a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveProne sleep is an identified risk factor for sudden infant death syndrome, possibly due to reduced blood pressure, cerebral oxygenation, and impaired cerebral vascular control. Cardiac and respiratory responses in neonates during supine and prone sleep have not been reported. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this study, daytime polysomnography (PSG) data from 17 neonates aged 2-3 days during supine and prone sleep were reported and the NDN gene, an important gene for neonatal respiratory control, was sequenced for correlation with neonatal respiratory parameters. Heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation, carbon dioxide concentration, sleep stages, central apnea index (CAI), obstructive apnea/hypopnea index (OAHI), and oxygen nadir were compared between supine and prone sleep and between participants with different single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the NDN gene.
resultsDuring prone sleep, neonates had a faster HR, decreased oxygen saturation, and a longer duration of oxygen saturation <90% than during supine sleep, suggesting that cardiopulmonary responsiveness was impaired. Sleep efficiency, sleep stages, oxygen nadir, and carbon dioxide tension were not different during supine and prone sleep. Central apnea occurred more significantly than obstructive apnea. During supine and prone sleep, the CAI was 3.3 ± 2.9/h and 2.3 ± 2.6/h and the OAHI was 0.6 ± 0.7/h and 0.6 ± 0.8/h, respectively. We found one SNP rs3743340 in the NDN gene that had no effect on the sleep and respiratory parameters of PSG.
conclusionTachycardia and respiratory instability were recorded in neonates during prone sleep, suggesting that neonates are vulnerable to cardiopulmonary events during prone sleep. Therefore, young neonates should be kept in the supine sleep position unless there are contraindications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.