Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31007423›Full record

ReviewAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology

Expert Group Meeting on Aphasia: A Report.

Apoorva Pauranik, Annamma George, Aparna Sahu, Ashima Nehra, Avanthi Paplikar, Chitralekha Bhat, Gopee Krishnan, Harsimar Kaur, Jitendra Saini, P A Suresh and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Apoorva PauranikProfessor, Deaprtment of Neurology, M.G.M. Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Annamma GeorgeSpeech Language Pathologist, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Aparna SahuScientist, Psyneuronics, Banglore, Karnataka, India.
Ashima NehraProfessor, Deapartment of Clinical Neuropsychology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Avanthi PaplikarSpeech language Pathologist, Banglore, Karnataka, India.
Chitralekha BhatScientist, TCS Research and Innovations, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Gopee KrishnanProfessor, Speech Language Pathology, School of Allied Health sciences, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Harsimar KaurResearch Officer, Clinical Neuropsychology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Jitendra SainiProfessor, Neuro-Radiology, NIMHANS, Banglore, Karnataka, India.
P A SureshProfessor, Neurologist, Director, ICCONS, Trichur, Kerala, India.
Pawan OjhaConsultant, Neurology, Fortis Hospital, Vashi, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Pinky SinghSpeech Language Pathology, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Pratap SanchetiConsultant Neurologist, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Prathibha KaranthSpeech Language Pathologist, Director, Communication DEALL Trust, Banglore, Karnataka, India.
P S MathuranathProfessor, Neurology, NIMHANS, Banglore, Karnataka, India.
Satyapal GoswamiProfessor, Speech Language Pathology, AIISH, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
Sonal ChitnisAssistant Professor, Speech Language Pathology, Bharti Vidyapeeth, Pune, India.
N SundarScientist, Psyneuronics, Banglore, Karnataka, India.
Suvarna AlladiProfessor, Neurology, NIMHANS, Banglore, Karnataka, India.
Yasmeen Faroqi-ShahAphasia Research Center, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multidisciplinary team of experts took stock of the current state of affairs about many aspects of aphasia in India, including community burden, diagnostic assessment, therapy, rehabilitation, research, education, and advocacy. The broad spectrum of aphasiology was matched by the types of participants ranging from neurologists, speech-language pathologists, clinical psychologists, linguists, to experts in neuroimaging and computer sciences. Threadbare discussion in 16 sessions over 3 days leads to the identification of pressing problems and possible solutions. Many action plans have been envisaged and recommendations made. A few examples with high priority are community-based and hospital-based study incidence and prevalence of aphasia, development of test batteries for the assessment of many components of speech and communication in Indian languages which are validated on rigorous psychometric, and linguistic criteria, national registry for aphasia, educational modules about aphasia for different target groups, resources for advocacy and its training, a bank of research questions and outlines of research protocols for young professionals to pursue. The expert group will continue to oversee execution of some of the actionable plans in short and long term.

Indexed as

Action plansaphasia in Indiarecommendations

Identifiers

PMID31007423
PMCPMC6472241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.