ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2020
Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.
Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy and clinical effectiveness of fetal growth monitoring strategies for the prediction of small for gestational age at birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Temporal External Validation of a Customized Fetal Body Mass Index Percentile Model for Neonatal Nutritional Status Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Differences in prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in term pregnancies by choice of fetal growth reference: A validation study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Generalisability of Maternal Genetic Risk Score for Birth Weight Across Racial Identity and Ancestry: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Observational
- Do Birthweight-For-Gestational Age Centiles Predict Serious Neonatal Morbidity and Neonatal Mortality?Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2026Article
- Impact of race-based customization on detection of fetal growth restriction.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025Article
- Use of a Maternal Genetic Risk Score to Derive and Test a Genetically Customized Fetal Growth Curve.O&G open · 2025Article
- Fetal and Neonatal Outcomes in Fetuses with an Estimated Fetal Weight Percentile of 10-20 in the Early Third Trimester: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Concordance Between Estimated Fetal Weight by Ultrasound and Birth Weight and Its Association with Adverse Perinatal Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- AI-based analysis of fetal growth restriction in a prospective obstetric cohort quantifies compound risks for perinatal morbidity and mortality and identifies previously unrecognized high risk clinical scenarios.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Observational
- Antenatal prediction of small for gestational age at birth based on four birthweight standards using machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024Article
- Point: Abnormalities of foetal growth-Is it time to move towards a personalised medicine approach to predict adverse neonatal outcomes?Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2024Article
- Routine third trimester ultrasonography in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes: a prospective cohort study at a tertiary-care hospital in Eastern India.Journal of ultrasound · 2023Article
- Article
- Prediction of large-for-gestational-age infant by fetal growth charts and hemoglobin A1c level in pregnancy complicated by pregestational diabetes.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2022Article
- Urinary phthalate metabolite mixtures in pregnancy and fetal growth: Findings from the infant development and the environment study.Environment international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the predictive performance of estimated fetal weight (EFW) percentiles, according to eight growth standards, to detect fetuses at risk for adverse perinatal outcome.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of 3437 African-American women. Population-based (Hadlock, INTERGROWTH-21
resultsTen percent (341/3437) of neonates were classified as small-for-gestational age (SGA) at birth, and of these 16.4% (56/341) had at least one adverse perinatal outcome. SGA neonates had a 1.5-fold increased risk of any adverse perinatal outcome (P < 0.05). The screen-positive rate of EFW < 10
conclusionsFetuses with EFW < 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.