Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31006834›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2019

Opioids: A Review of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Neonates, Infants, and Children.

James C Thigpen, Brian L Odle, Sam Harirforoosh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systemic opioid regimens for postoperative pain in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Systemic opioid regimens for postoperative pain in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James C ThigpenDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Gatton College of Pharmacy, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Brian L OdleDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Gatton College of Pharmacy, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Sam HarirforooshDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gatton College of Pharmacy, East Tennessee State University, Box 70594, Johnson City, TN, 37614-1708, USA. harirfor@etsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2631-3756
East Tennessee State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain management in the pediatric population is complex for many reasons. Mild pain is usually managed quite well with oral acetaminophen or ibuprofen. Situations involving more severe pain often require the use of an opioid, which may be administered by many different routes, depending on clinical necessity. Acute and chronic disease states, as well as the constantly changing maturational process, produce unique challenges at every level of pediatrics in dosing and management of all medications, especially with regard to high-risk opioids. Although there has been significant progress in the understanding of opioid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in neonates, infants, children, and adolescents, somewhat limited data exist from which necessary information, concerning the safe and effective use of these agents, may be drawn. The evidence here provided is intended to be helpful in directing the practitioner to patient-specific reasons for preferring one opioid over another. As our knowledge of opioids and their effects has grown, it has become clear that older medications like codeine and meperidine (pethidine) have very limited use in pediatrics. This review provides pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evidence on the currently available opioids: morphine, fentanyl (and derivatives), codeine, meperidine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, methadone, buprenorphine, butorphanol, nalbuphine, pentazocin, ketobemidone, tramadol, piritramide, naloxone and naltrexone. Morphine, being the most studied opioid analgesic, is the standard against which all others are compared. Pharmacokinetic parameters of morphine that have been found in neonates, i.e., higher volume of distribution, immature metabolic processes that develop at various rates, elimination that is variable based on age and weight, as well as treated and untreated disease processes, are an example of all opioids in the population discussed in this review. Outside the premature and neonatal population, the use of opioids in infants, children, and adolescents quickly begins to resemble the established values found in adults. As such, the concerns (risks) of these medications become comparable to those seen in adults.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsChildHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPainPain ManagementAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID31006834
OpenAlexW2942140993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.