Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31006821›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2019

Clinico-pathologic and mammographic characteristics of inflammatory and non-inflammatory breast cancer at six centers in North Africa.

Catherine Schairer, Ahmed Hablas, Ibrahim AbdelBar Seif Eldein, Rabab Gaafar, Henda Rais, Amel Mezlini, Farhat Ben Ayed, Wided Ben Ayoub, Abdellatif Benider, Ali Tahri and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How to Define Inflammatory Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Developing and Maintaining a Global Research Training Infrastructure for Cancer Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  6. Medical Oncology Education in Egypt Over the Past 50 Years: the Experience of the National Cancer Institute of Cairo University.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  7. Global Aspects of the Cancer Epidemiology Education in Special Populations (CEESP) Program.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Catherine SchairerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. schairec@exchange.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7671-4972
Ahmed HablasGharbiah Cancer Society, Tanta, Egypt.
Ibrahim AbdelBar Seif EldeinGharbiah Cancer Society, Tanta, Egypt.
Rabab GaafarNational Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt.
Henda RaisInstitute Salah Azaiz, Tunis, Tunisia.
Amel MezliniInstitute Salah Azaiz, Tunis, Tunisia.
Farhat Ben AyedAssociation for the Fight Against Cancer, Tunis, Tunisia.
Wided Ben AyoubInstitute Salah Azaiz, Tunis, Tunisia.
Abdellatif BeniderIbn Rochd Oncology Center, Casablanca, Morocco.
Ali TahriClinique Spécialisée Menara, Marrakech, Morocco.
Mouna KhouchaniUniversity Hospital Center Mohammed VI, Marrakech, Morocco.
Dalia AboulazmNational Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt.
Mehdi KarkouriIbn Rochd Oncology Center, Casablanca, Morocco.
Saad EissaNational Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt.
Ruth M PfeifferDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Shahinaz M GadallaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sandra M SwainGeorgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Sofia D MerajverUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Linda Morris BrownRTI International, Rockville, MD, USA.
Amr S SolimanMedical School of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Institut Salah-Azaïz · TNNational Institutes of Health · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Ibn Rochd · MAAssociation Tunisienne Contre le Cancer · TNCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Mohammed VI · MACity University of New York · USGeorgetown University · USRTI International · USSup de Co Marrakech · MAUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Epidemiologic Field StudiesZIACP010182 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI GAIL, MITCHELL H · 2009 to 2025
$11.9M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CP010182NCI NIH HHS R25 CA112382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe describe the clinico-pathologic and mammographic characteristics of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and non-IBC cases enrolled in a case-control study. Because IBC is a clinico-pathologic entity with rapid appearance of erythema and other signs, its diagnosis is based on clinical observation and thus, by necessity, subjective. Therefore, we evaluate our cases by photographic review by outside expert clinicians and by degree of adherence to the two most recent definitions of IBC: the international expert panel consensus statement and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition (we used the slightly less restrictive 7th edition definition for our study).

methodsWe enrolled 267 IBC and 274 age- and geographically matched non-IBC cases at 6 sites in Egypt, Tunisia, and Morocco in a case-control study of IBC conducted between 2009 and 2015. We collected clinico-pathologic and mammographic data and standardized medical photographs of the breast.

resultsWe identified many differences between IBC and non-IBC cases: 54.5% versus 68.8% were estrogen receptor-positive, 39.9% versus 14.8% human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, 91% versus 4% exhibited erythema, 63% versus 97% had a mass, and 57% versus 10% had mammographic evidence of skin thickening. Seventy-six percent of IBC cases adhered to the expert panel consensus statement and 36% to the AJCC definition; 86 percent were confirmed as IBC by either photographic review or adherence to the consensus statement.

conclusionsWe successfully identified distinct groups of IBC and non-IBC cases. The reliability of IBC diagnosis would benefit from expert review of standardized medical photographs and associated clinical information.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesEgyptErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansInflammatory Breast NeoplasmsMammographyMiddle AgedMoroccoNeoplasm GradingReceptors, EstrogenTunisiaERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenDiagnostic criteriaEgyptInflammatory breast cancerMoroccoTunisia

Identifiers

PMID31006821
PMCPMC6705400
OpenAlexW2941322943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.