ArticleRevista espanola de salud publica2019
[Assessment of the effectiveness of an intervention to improve immunization coverage in splenectomy patients].
Article in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- [Impact of an intervention to improve the vaccination coverage againstRevista espanola de salud publica · 2019Article
- [Influenza vaccination coverages and related factors among splenectomy patients from a health sector in Zaragoza (Spain)].Revista espanola de salud publica · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSplenectomized patients have an increased risk of sepsis caused by encapsulated bacteria. Pneumococcal, meningococcal and Haemophilus influenzae B vaccination is recommended in this group. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of the introduction of an immunization hospital clinic on their immunization coverages.
methodsQuasi-experimental study. The control group included patients splenectomized between January 2012-April 2014, and the intervention group included patients splenectomized between May 2014-December 2016. The global and specific immunization coverages were compared between both groups using a Chi-square test.
results80 patients were analyzed. The most commonly administered vaccine was the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (65.0%). A significant improvement was observed both in the global immunization rate (17.1% in the pre-intervention study vs. 57.8% in the post-intervention study) (RR: 3.37; 95% CI: 1.56-7.27) and in the specific immunization rate for the Haemophilus influenzae B, meningococcal C and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines.
conclusionsIntroducing an immunization hospital clinic is an effective measure to improve the immunization coverage of splenectomy patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31006771PMC11583162W2981281296What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.