Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31006770›Full record

Trial reportRevista espanola de salud publica2019

[Use of mobile immunization teams to increase influenza vaccination coverage among heatlthcare workers. A community intervention trial].

Emili Navalón Ramon, Inmaculada Martínez Pardo, Tamara Sendra Barbosa, Núria Hernández Ferrando, Beatriz Morcillo Escudero, Vicente Esquer Hernandis

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emili Navalón RamonCentre de Salut Ontinyent-II. Ontinyent. Valencia. España.
Inmaculada Martínez PardoCentre de Salut Ontinyent-II. Ontinyent. Valencia. España.
Tamara Sendra BarbosaCentro de Salud Pública de Xàtiva. Xàtiva. Valencia. España.
Núria Hernández FerrandoCentre de Salut de Vallada. Vallada. Valencia. España.
Beatriz Morcillo EscuderoServicio de Urgencias Generales. Hospital Lluís Alcanyís. Xàtiva. Valencia. España.
Vicente Esquer HernandisCentre de Salut Ontinyent-III. Ontinyent. Valencia. España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe use of mobile immunization teams has been proposed as a strategy to increase influenza vaccination (IV) coverage among healthcare workers (HCW), but has not been evaluated in Primary Healthcare (PHC). The objective of this work was to determine if the use of mobile immunization teams increases IV coverage among HCW of a basic health area in the Valencian Community.

methodsCommunity intervention trial that included all HCWs from a basic health area in the Valencian Community. The assignment was by conglomerates in one stage, with the HCWs of a health center as an intervention group and that of the rest of the centers as a control group. The intervention group was visited by a team consisting of a doctor and a nurse who offered on-site IV, while the control group did not receive such a visit. The independent variable was the visit of the mobile immunization team and the dependent variable was IV in the study season (2015-2016). Data analysis was done both for the total IV coverage and separately for sex, age, professional category and history of IV in the previous seasons. A McNemar test was used to compare frequency distributions of paired data.

resultsThe control group went from 14 (31.8%) vaccinated in the 2014-2015 season to 19 (45.2%) in the 2015-2016 season, while the intervention group went from 19 (30.6%) to 34 (54.8%). Among the total of the WHCs it went from 33 (31.3%) vaccinated to 53 (50.0%). This increase was significant. By groups, the increase was significant among those who received the visit of the mobile team (p = 0.0003), but not in the control group (p = 0.18).

conclusionsThe visit of a mobile immunization team is a significant factor favorable to IV among HCW in our setting.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelInfluenza VaccinesMobile Health UnitsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesOccupational HealthProspective StudiesSeasonsInfluenza VaccinesHealth personnelHuman influenzaImmunization programsInfluenza vaccinesOccupational healthPrimary health carePublic healthSpainVaccination coverageVaccines

Identifiers

PMID31006770
PMCPMC11582901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.