Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31006540›Full record

SynthesisNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2019

Incorporating the social context into neurocognitive models of adolescent decision-making: A neuroimaging meta-analysis.

Jorien van Hoorn, Holly Shablack, Kristen A Lindquist, Eva H Telzer

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neural connectivity underlying adolescent social learning in sibling dyads.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A Call for Greater Attention to Culture in the Study of Brain and Development.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2021
    Review
  18. Neural Correlates of Conflicting Social Influence on Adolescent Risk Taking.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2021
    Article
  19. Where You Lead, I Will Follow: Exploring Sibling Similarity in Brain and Behavior During Risky Decision Making.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jorien van HoornDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: jorienvanhoorn@gmail.com.
Holly ShablackDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Kristen A LindquistDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Eva H TelzerDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Funding

Incorporating the Social Context into Neurocognitive Models of Adolescent Risk TakingR01DA039923 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TELZER, EVA HAIMO · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurobiological models of adolescent decision-making emphasize developmental changes in brain regions involved in affect (e.g., ventral striatum) and cognitive control (e.g., lateral prefrontal cortex). Although social context plays an important role in adolescent decision-making, current models do not discuss brain regions implicated in processing social information (e.g., dorsomedial prefrontal cortex). We conducted a coordinate-based meta-analysis using the Multilevel peak Kernel Density Analysis (MKDA) method to test the hypothesis that brain regions involved in affect, cognitive control, and social information processing support adolescent decision-making in social contexts (N = 21 functional neuroimaging studies; N = 1292 participants). Results indicated that dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus/insula and ventral striatum are consistently associated with adolescent decision-making in social contexts. Activity within these regions was modulated by the type of social context and social actors involved. Findings suggest including brain regions involved in social information processing into models of adolescent decision-making. We propose a 'constructionist' model, which describes psychological processes and corresponding neural networks related to affect, cognitive control, and social information processing.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentInterpersonal RelationsModels, NeurologicalPsychology, AdolescentAdolescentBrainDecision MakingHumansNeuroimagingPeer InfluenceRisk-TakingSocial BehaviorSocial Environment

Identifiers

PMID31006540
PMCPMC6659412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.