ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019
Evolutionary aspects of reservoir computing.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Device-level nonlinearity and temporal memory in optoelectronic reservoir computing.Nano convergence · 2025Review
- Novel efficient reservoir computing methodologies for regular and irregular time series classification.Nonlinear dynamics · 2025Article
- Self-Improvising Memory: A Perspective on Memories as Agential, Dynamically Reinterpreting Cognitive Glue.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A neural network model for the evolution of learning in changing environments.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Interface-type tunable oxygen ion dynamics for physical reservoir computing.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Precise Traits from Sloppy Components: Perception and the Origin of Phenotypic Response.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- A biomarker discovery framework for childhood anxiety.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Evolution of Brains and Computers: The Roads Not Taken.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Continuous monitoring of surgical bimanual expertise using deep neural networks in virtual reality simulation.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
- A Primer on Hyperdimensional Computing for iEEG Seizure Detection.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Fate of Duplicated Neural Structures.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Ageing, computation and the evolution of neural regeneration processes.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020Article
- Locating the Inexhaustible: Material, Medium, and Ambient Information.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Review
- Liquid brains, solid brains.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reservoir computing (RC) is a powerful computational paradigm that allows high versatility with cheap learning. While other artificial intelligence approaches need exhaustive resources to specify their inner workings, RC is based on a reservoir with highly nonlinear dynamics that does not require a fine tuning of its parts. These dynamics project input signals into high-dimensional spaces, where training linear readouts to extract input features is vastly simplified. Thus, inexpensive learning provides very powerful tools for decision-making, controlling dynamical systems, classification, etc. RC also facilitates solving multiple tasks in parallel, resulting in a high throughput. Existing literature focuses on applications in artificial intelligence and neuroscience. We review this literature from an evolutionary perspective. RC's versatility makes it a great candidate to solve outstanding problems in biology, which raises relevant questions. Is RC as abundant in nature as its advantages should imply? Has it evolved? Once evolved, can it be easily sustained? Under what circumstances? (In other words, is RC an evolutionarily stable computing paradigm?) To tackle these issues, we introduce a conceptual morphospace that would map computational selective pressures that could select for or against RC and other computing paradigms. This guides a speculative discussion about the questions above and allows us to propose a solid research line that brings together computation and evolution with RC as test model of the proposed hypotheses. This article is part of the theme issue 'Liquid brains, solid brains: How distributed cognitive architectures process information'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.