Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31006368›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019

Statistical physics of liquid brains.

Jordi Piñero, Ricard Solé

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Foraging ants as liquid brains: Movement heterogeneity shapes collective efficiency.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Metareview: a survey of active matter reviews.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Fate of Duplicated Neural Structures.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  12. Liquid brains, solid brains.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jordi Piñero1 ICREA-Complex Systems Lab, Universitat Pompeu Fabra , 08003 Barcelona , Spain.
Ricard Solé1 ICREA-Complex Systems Lab, Universitat Pompeu Fabra , 08003 Barcelona , Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid neural networks (or 'liquid brains') are a widespread class of cognitive living networks characterized by a common feature: the agents (ants or immune cells, for example) move in space. Thus, no fixed, long-term agent-agent connections are maintained, in contrast with standard neural systems. How is this class of systems capable of displaying cognitive abilities, from learning to decision-making? In this paper, the collective dynamics, memory and learning properties of liquid brains is explored under the perspective of statistical physics. Using a comparative approach, we review the generic properties of three large classes of systems, namely: standard neural networks (solid brains), ant colonies and the immune system. It is shown that, despite their intrinsic physical differences, these systems share key properties with standard neural systems in terms of formal descriptions, but strongly depart in other ways. On one hand, the attractors found in liquid brains are not always based on connection weights but instead on population abundances. However, some liquid systems use fluctuations in ways similar to those found in cortical networks, suggesting a relevant role for criticality as a way of rapidly reacting to external signals. This article is part of the theme issue 'Liquid brains, solid brains: How distributed cognitive architectures process information'.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntsBrainHumansImmune SystemNerve NetNeural Networks, Computerbrainscollective intelligencecriticalityevolutionphase transitions

Identifiers

PMID31006368
PMCPMC6553585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.