Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31006367›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019

How does mobility help distributed systems compute?

William F Vining, Fernando Esponda, Melanie E Moses, Stephanie Forrest

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Fate of Duplicated Neural Structures.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. From Microbial Communities to Distributed Computing Systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  7. Liquid brains, solid brains.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William F Vining1 University of New Mexico , Albuquerque, NM , USA.
Fernando Esponda2 Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México, Mexico DF , Mexico.
Melanie E Moses1 University of New Mexico , Albuquerque, NM , USA.
Stephanie Forrest3 Santa Fe Institute , Santa Fe, NM , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brains are composed of connected neurons that compute by transmitting signals. The neurons are generally fixed in space, but the communication patterns that enable information processing change rapidly. By contrast, other biological systems, such as ant colonies, bacterial colonies, slime moulds and immune systems, process information using agents that communicate locally while moving through physical space. We refer to systems in which agents are strongly connected and immobile as solid, and to systems in which agents are not hardwired to each other and can move freely as liquid. We ask how collective computation depends on agent movement. A liquid cellular automaton (LCA) demonstrates the effect of movement and communication locality on consensus problems. A simple mathematical model predicts how these properties of the LCA affect how quickly information propagates through the system. While solid brains allow complex network structures to move information over long distances, mobility provides an alternative way for agents to transport information when long-range connectivity is expensive or infeasible. Our results show how simple mobile agents solve global information processing tasks more effectively than similar systems that are stationary. This article is part of the theme issue 'Liquid brains, solid brains: How distributed cognitive architectures process information'.

Indexed as

Computer Communication NetworksComputersModels, BiologicalMovementAnimalsAntsBacterial Physiological PhenomenaCognitionImmune SystemPhysarum polycephalumcollective computationconsensusmobilitymulti-agent systems

Identifiers

PMID31006367
PMCPMC6553594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.