Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31006359›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2019

Efficacy of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as well as genotypic and phenotypic methods in identification of staphylococci other than

Anna Wanecka, Jarosław Król, Jan Twardoń, Jacek Mrowiec, Agnieszka Korzeniowska-Kowal, Anna Wzorek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Review of Current Knowledge onAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna WaneckaDepartments of Pathology (Wanecka, Król), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.
Jarosław KrólDepartments of Pathology (Wanecka, Król), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0012-4022
Jan TwardońDepartments of Pathology (Wanecka, Król), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.
Jacek MrowiecDepartments of Pathology (Wanecka, Król), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.
Agnieszka Korzeniowska-KowalDepartments of Pathology (Wanecka, Król), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.
Anna WzorekDepartments of Pathology (Wanecka, Król), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of various methods for the identification of

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleFemaleGenotypeHumansMastitis, BovinePolandRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcusRNA, Ribosomal, 16Scattlegenotypic identificationintramammary infectionMALDI-TOF MSPoland

Identifiers

PMID31006359
PMCPMC6857020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.