Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31006107›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019

Machine learning methods for automated technical skills assessment with instructional feedback in ultrasound-guided interventions.

Matthew S Holden, Sean Xia, Hillary Lia, Zsuzsanna Keri, Colin Bell, Lindsey Patterson, Tamas Ungi, Gabor Fichtinger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Evaluation of augmented reality training for a navigation device used for CT-guided needle placement.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Cannulation Skill Assessment Using Functional Data Analysis.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthew S HoldenLaboratory for Percutaneous Surgery, School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. 72mh@queensu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6031-7208
Sean XiaLaboratory for Percutaneous Surgery, School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Hillary LiaLaboratory for Percutaneous Surgery, School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Zsuzsanna KeriLaboratory for Percutaneous Surgery, School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Colin BellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Lindsey PattersonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Tamas UngiLaboratory for Percutaneous Surgery, School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Gabor FichtingerLaboratory for Percutaneous Surgery, School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Funding

Link Foundation Fellowship in ModellingLink Foundation SimulationLink Foundation Training
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCurrently, there is a worldwide shift toward competency-based medical education. This necessitates the use of automated skills assessment methods during self-guided interventions training. Making assessment methods that are transparent and configurable will allow assessment to be interpreted into instructional feedback. The purpose of this work is to develop and validate skills assessment methods in ultrasound-guided interventions that are transparent and configurable.

methodsWe implemented a method based upon decision trees and a method based upon fuzzy inference systems for technical skills assessment. Subsequently, we validated these methods for their ability to predict scores of operators on a 25-point global rating scale in ultrasound-guided needle insertions and their ability to provide useful feedback for training.

resultsDecision tree and fuzzy rule-based assessment performed comparably to state-of-the-art assessment methods. They produced median errors (on a 25-point scale) of 1.7 and 1.8 for in-plane insertions and 1.5 and 3.0 for out-of-plane insertions, respectively. In addition, these methods provided feedback that was useful for trainee learning. Decision tree assessment produced feedback with median usefulness 7 out of 7; fuzzy rule-based assessment produced feedback with median usefulness 6 out of 7.

conclusionTransparent and configurable assessment methods are comparable to the state of the art and, in addition, can provide useful feedback. This demonstrates their value in self-guided interventions training curricula.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceDecision TreesMachine LearningEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansRadiology, InterventionalReproducibility of ResultsSurgery, Computer-AssistedUltrasonographyMedical educationObjective skill assessmentSimulation-based trainingUltrasound-guided needle insertion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.