Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31006098›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2019

Potential risk factors of ovarian cancer and analysis of CA125, a biomarker used for its monitoring and diagnosis.

Muhammad Mansha, Arooba Gill, Peter C Thomson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Down regulation of fatty acid synthaseCurrent research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad ManshaDivision of Science and Technology, Department of Zoology, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan. dr.mansha@ue.edu.pk.
Arooba GillDivision of Science and Technology, Department of Zoology, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.
Peter C ThomsonSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
University of Education · PKUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the fourth most common cancer among Pakistani, Scottish and Chinese women. The aim of the present study was to determine the association of potential risk factors with OC and analysis of Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) in its monitoring and diagnosis. A total of 200 patients diagnosed with OC were included in this study. All the patients were interviewed and 54 OC patients (case group) and 35 age-matched healthy subjects (control group) gave their blood for analysis of CA125. The blood of case and control groups was subjected to an ELISA test for the evaluation of CA125 levels. Majority of the patients were of 40-50 years of age and most of the patients were diagnosed at this period of life. The majority of the patients experienced their first menarche and menopause at the age of 13-14 and 40-50 years respectively. There is no significant association between early menarche and OC family history, nor between late menopause and OC family history. There is a significant association between family history of breast cancer (BC) and age of menarche (P = 0.005). An OC patient with an age of menarche of 13 years or younger has 2.8 times the odds of having a family history of BC than those whose age of menarche is more than 13 years. Eleven percent of patients diagnosed with OC received no intervention. All other patients underwent treatment options including hysterectomy (69.5%), radiotherapy (39%) and chemotherapy (95%). The profiles of the patients showed that those who had a family history of OC were more likely to provide blood samples (OR = 3.87, P = 0.025), and similarly for those with a history of breast cancer (OR = 2.83, P = 0.022) in comparison to those who were not willing to provide blood for testing of biomarker. The distribution of CA125 for OC patients and control group showed that CA125 values were significantly higher (P = 0.034) in the case patients compared with the control group. The decrease in CA125 levels indicated the positive response to treatment, whereas increase in CA125 values showed resistant and disease progression. 52% of the patients with OC were correctly diagnosed as having OC (based on the optimal cut-point of CA125), while 83% of those without OC were also correctly diagnosed (with 48% of OC patients and 17% of non-OC patients incorrectly diagnosed). We concluded that there is significant association between family history of breast cancer and OC history and use of CA125 as a biomarker is not an ideal diagnostic and monitoring test as it has low sensitivity and high specificity.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCA-125 AntigenCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMembrane ProteinsMenarcheMenopauseMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsRisk FactorsBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenMembrane ProteinsMUC16 protein, humanCA125ChemotherapyELISAOvarian cancer (OC)Sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID31006098
OpenAlexW2938640433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.