Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31006058›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2019

Validity and reliability of the French version of Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).

Jérôme R Lechien, Gaëtan Cavelier, Marie-Paule Thill, Kathy Huet, Bernard Harmegnies, Laura Bousard, Serge Blecic, Jan Vanderwegen, Alexandra Rodriguez, Didier Dequanter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Consensus for voice quality assessment in clinical practice: guidelines of the European Laryngological Society and Union of the European Phoniatricians.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bilateral selective laryngeal reinnervation in patients with bilateral vocal cord palsy.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2023
    Article
  16. Development and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Tamil Version of Eating Assessment Tool - 10 (EAT-10): Preliminary Findings from Persons with Head and Neck Cancer.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jérôme R LechienResearch Committee of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France. jerome.lechien@umons.ac.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0845-0845
Gaëtan CavelierDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre (CHU de Bruxelles), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Marie-Paule ThillDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre (CHU de Bruxelles), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Kathy HuetLaboratory of Phonetics, Psychology School, Research Institute for Language Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium.
Bernard HarmegniesLaboratory of Phonetics, Psychology School, Research Institute for Language Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium.
Laura BousardDepartment of Neurology, EpiCURA Hospital, Baudour, Belgium.
Serge BlecicDepartment of Neurology, EpiCURA Hospital, Baudour, Belgium.
Jan VanderwegenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre (CHU de Bruxelles), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Alexandra RodriguezDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre (CHU de Bruxelles), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Didier DequanterDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre (CHU de Bruxelles), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a French version of the Eating Assessment Tool (Fr EAT-10) and to assess its internal consistency, reliability and clinical validity.

methodsFifty-six patients referred in the Swallowing Clinics of CHU Saint-Pierre Hospital (Brussels) and EpiCURA hospital (Ath, Belgium) for dysphagia were enrolled and completed fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy. Seventy-three asymptomatic subjects were included in the study. To assess reliability, Fr-EAT-10 was completed twice within a 7-day period. Validity was assessed by comparing Fr-EAT-10 scores with the scores of dysphagia handicap index (DHI) in all individuals. Normative value of EAT-10 was calculated and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the best Fr-EAT-10 threshold associated with aspiration.

resultsFifty-two patients completed the study. Cronbach's alpha was 0.95 indicating a high internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was high in the entire cohort (r

conclusionThe Fr-EAT-10 developed in this study is a reliable and valid self-administered tool in the evaluation of dysphagia in French-speaking patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBelgiumCohort StudiesDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersEatingFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSurveys and QuestionnairesDisorderDysphagiaEatEAT-10EatingSwallowingTool

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.