Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31006024›Full record

ReviewHealth promotion international2020

Non-communicable disease prevention in Mexico: policies, programs and regulations.

Benjamin Aceves, Maia Ingram, Claudia Nieto, Jill Guernsey de Zapien, Cecilia Rosales

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health promotion international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin AcevesUniversity of Arizona, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, 1296 N. Martin, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.
Maia IngramUniversity of Arizona, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, 1296 N. Martin, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.
Claudia NietoInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Centro de Investigación en Nutrición y Salud, 7a Cerrada de Fray Pedro de Gante 50, Tlalpan, Sección XVI, 14080 Ciudad de México, CDMX, Mexico.
Jill Guernsey de ZapienUniversity of Arizona, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, 1296 N. Martin, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.
Cecilia RosalesUniversity of Arizona, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, 1296 N. Martin, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.

Funding

Tools and Practices to Decrease CVD and Complications in the Diabetic Population of MexicoR01HL125996 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI ROSALES, CECILIA BALLESTEROS · 2015 to 2019
$3.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-communicable diseases (NCD), such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, have become a leading cause of the death in Mexico. The federal government has addressed this issue through developing NCD prevention plans, regulations and policies (PRPs) that seek to address social and environmental factors, which was led by the National Institute of Public Health and Ministry of Health in concert with various non-governmental organizations. This review aims to synthesize and summarize national NCD prevention PRPs addressing social and environmental factors passed from 2010 to 2016, and to assess the extent to which these efforts successfully addressed factors contributing to the epidemic. In total nine federal NCD prevention PRPs were identified from a scan that examined executive and legislative PRPs, which identified five documents. A scoping review was conducted for evaluation studies and reports corresponding to these PRPs. The majority of PRPs focused on nutrition, specifically the access and promotion of food. Studies and reports demonstrated that taxation on energy-dense low-nutrient foods and sugar-sweetened beverages were the most effective. Other PRPs had various issues with implementation, mostly related to adherence and resources available. Overall, there lacked evidence of evaluative work on several NCD prevention PRPs, specifically assessing implementation and effectiveness. Additionally, PRPs did not sufficiently address integration of clinical, social, environmental approaches and access to physical activity. While the Mexican federal government has taken the initial steps to address the multifactorial causes of NCD, firm political commitment and investment of significant resources are still needed.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPolicy MakingPreventive Health ServicesHumansMexicoNoncommunicable DiseasesNutritional StatusWorld Health Organizationchronic illnesshealth policyMexicopreventionscoping review

Identifiers

PMID31006024
PMCPMC7313413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.