Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31005945›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

A theory-based, task-oriented, outdoor walking programme for older adults with difficulty walking outdoors: protocol for the Getting Older Adults Outdoors (GO-OUT) randomised controlled trial.

Nancy M Salbach, Ruth Barclay, Sandra C Webber, C A Jones, Nancy E Mayo, Lisa M Lix, Jacquie Ripat, Theresa Grant, Cornelia van Ineveld, Philip D Chilibeck

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03292510 (Getting Older Adults OUTdoors), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03292510 nacompletednot on this map

Getting Older Adults OUTdoors (GO-OUT): A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Theory-based, Task-oriented, Outdoor Walking Program for Older Adults With Difficulty Walking Outdoors

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TorontoRan2018 to 2020Enrolled190ConditionsOlder Adults With Decreased Outdoor Walking AbilityArmsGO-OUT Group, Workshop Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nancy M SalbachDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6178-0691
Ruth BarclayDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Sandra C WebberDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
C A JonesDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Nancy E MayoSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Lisa M LixDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Jacquie RipatDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Theresa GrantBruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Cornelia van IneveldSection of Geriatric Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Philip D ChilibeckCollege of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 376439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA theory-based, task-oriented, community walking programme can increase outdoor walking activity among older adults to optimise functional independence, social participation and well-being. The study objective is to determine if there is a difference in the change in outdoor walking activity from baseline to 10 weeks, 5.5 months and 12 months after receiving a 1-day interactive workshop and outdoor walking programme (Getting Older Adults Outdoors (GO-OUT)) compared with the workshop and weekly reminders (WR) in older adults with difficulty walking outdoors. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised controlled trial is being conducted in four urban Canadian communities. We will stratify 240 individuals by site and participant type (ie, individual vs spousal/friend pair) and randomise to either the GO-OUT or WR intervention. The GO-OUT intervention involves a 1-day workshop, where participants complete eight interactive stations to build knowledge and skills to walk outside, followed by a 10-week group outdoor walking programme (two 1-hour sessions/week) led by a physiotherapist or kinesiologist in parks. The WR intervention consists of the same workshop and 10 weekly telephone reminders to facilitate outdoor walking. The primary outcome measure is mean outdoor walking time in minutes/week derived from accelerometry and global positioning system data. GO-OUT is powered to detect an effect size of 0.4, given α=0.05, β=0.20, equal number of participants/group and a 20% attrition rate. Secondary outcomes include physical activity, lifespace mobility, participation, health-related quality of life, balance, leg strength, walking self-efficacy, walking speed, walking distance/endurance and mood. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: GO-OUT has received ethics approval at all sites. A Data Safety Monitoring Board will monitor adverse events. We will disseminate findings through lay summaries, conference presentations and journal articles. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03292510 (Pre-results).

Indexed as

WalkingAgedAged, 80 and overExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMobility LimitationMovement DisordersQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocial Participationadultscommunity exercise programolderoutdoorphysical activityrandomized trial protocoltask-oriented trainingwalking

Identifiers

PMID31005945
PMCPMC6500266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.