ArticleBMJ open2019
Could implementation of mifepristone address Canada's urban-rural abortion access disparity: a mixed-methods implementation study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The influence of rurality on women's decision making and pregnancy choices following an unintended pregnancy: A systematic review.Women's health (London, England)Pooled it
- What motivates primary care providers to prescribe mifepristone medication abortion? Results of a qualitative investigation in Canada.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- The experiences of family planning health professionals providing care to incarcerated patients: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Nurse practitioner medication abortion providers in Canada: results from a national survey.BMJ sexual & reproductive health · 2025Article
- How integrated knowledge translation worked to reduce federal policy barriers to the implementation of medication abortion in Canada: a realist evaluation.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- User-Centered Development of a Patient Decision Aid for Choice of Early Abortion Method: Multi-Cycle Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Article
- Nurse practitioners on 'the leading edge' of medication abortion care: A feminist qualitative approach.Journal of advanced nursing · 2023Article
- Barriers and enablers to nurse practitioner implementation of medication abortion in Canada: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Pharmacist direct dispensing of mifepristone for medication abortion in Canada: a survey of community pharmacists.BMJ open · 2022Article
- A Virtual Community of Practice to Support Physician Uptake of a Novel Abortion Practice: Mixed Methods Case Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Use of the CPD-REACTION Questionnaire to Evaluate Continuing Professional Development Activities for Health Professionals: Systematic Review.JMIR medical education · 2022Review
- The perspective of Canadian health care professionals on abortion service during the COVID-19 pandemic.Family practice · 2021Article
- Pharmacist dispensing of the abortion pill in Canada: Diffusion of Innovation meets integrated knowledge translation.Implementation science : IS · 2021Article
- Perspectives Among Canadian Physicians on Factors Influencing Implementation of Mifepristone Medical Abortion: A National Qualitative Study.Annals of family medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- Implementation of mifepristone medical abortion in Canada: pilot and feasibility testing of a survey to assess facilitators and barriers.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2019Article
- Article
- Pharmacist checklist and resource guide for mifepristone medical abortion: User-centred development and testing.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPCArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn January 2017, mifepristone-induced medical abortion was made available in Canada. In this study, we will seek to (1) understand facilitators and barriers to the implementation of mifepristone across Canada, (2) assess the impact of a 'community of practice' clinical and health service support platform and (3) engage in and assess the impact of integrated knowledge translation (iKT) activities aimed to improve health policy, systems and service delivery issues to enhance patient access to mifepristone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective mixed-methods implementation study will involve a national sample of physicians and pharmacists recruited via an online training programme, professional networks and a purpose-built community of practice website. Surveys that explore constructs related to diffusion of innovation and Godin's behaviour change frameworks will be conducted at baseline and at 6 months, and qualitative data will be collected from electronic interactions on the website. Survey participants and a purposeful sample of decision-makers will be invited to participate in in-depth interviews. Descriptive analyses will be conducted for quantitative data. Thematic analysis guided by the theoretical frameworks will guide interpretation of qualitative data. We will conduct and assess iKT activities involving Canada's leading health system and health professional leaders, including evidence briefs, Geographical Information System (GIS)maps, face-to-face meetings and regular electronic exchanges. Findings will contribute to understanding the mechanisms of iKT relationships and activities that have a meaningful effect on uptake of evidence into policy and practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was received from the University of British Columbia Children's and Women's Hospital Ethics Review Board (H16-01006). Full publication of the work will be sought in an international peer-reviewed journal. Findings will be disseminated to research participants through newsletters and media interviews, and to policy-makers through invited evidence briefs and face-to-face presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.