Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31005943›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Could implementation of mifepristone address Canada's urban-rural abortion access disparity: a mixed-methods implementation study protocol.

Wendy V Norman, Sarah Munro, Melissa Brooks, Courtney Devane, Edith Guilbert, Regina Renner, Tamil Kendall, Judith A Soon, Ashley Waddington, Marie-Soleil Wagner and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wendy V NormanDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sarah MunroDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Melissa BrooksDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Courtney DevaneDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Edith GuilbertInstitut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Regina RennerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Tamil KendallSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Judith A SoonFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ashley WaddingtonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Marie-Soleil WagnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Sheila DunnDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR CPP-329455-107837CIHR PHE148161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn January 2017, mifepristone-induced medical abortion was made available in Canada. In this study, we will seek to (1) understand facilitators and barriers to the implementation of mifepristone across Canada, (2) assess the impact of a 'community of practice' clinical and health service support platform and (3) engage in and assess the impact of integrated knowledge translation (iKT) activities aimed to improve health policy, systems and service delivery issues to enhance patient access to mifepristone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective mixed-methods implementation study will involve a national sample of physicians and pharmacists recruited via an online training programme, professional networks and a purpose-built community of practice website. Surveys that explore constructs related to diffusion of innovation and Godin's behaviour change frameworks will be conducted at baseline and at 6 months, and qualitative data will be collected from electronic interactions on the website. Survey participants and a purposeful sample of decision-makers will be invited to participate in in-depth interviews. Descriptive analyses will be conducted for quantitative data. Thematic analysis guided by the theoretical frameworks will guide interpretation of qualitative data. We will conduct and assess iKT activities involving Canada's leading health system and health professional leaders, including evidence briefs, Geographical Information System (GIS)maps, face-to-face meetings and regular electronic exchanges. Findings will contribute to understanding the mechanisms of iKT relationships and activities that have a meaningful effect on uptake of evidence into policy and practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was received from the University of British Columbia Children's and Women's Hospital Ethics Review Board (H16-01006). Full publication of the work will be sought in an international peer-reviewed journal. Findings will be disseminated to research participants through newsletters and media interviews, and to policy-makers through invited evidence briefs and face-to-face presentations.

Indexed as

Abortifacient Agents, SteroidalAbortion, InducedAdultCanadaFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMifepristonePregnancyProspective StudiesQualitative ResearchRural PopulationUrban PopulationAbortifacient Agents, SteroidalMifepristoneabortionhealth policyimplementationintegrated knowledge translationknowledge mobilization

Identifiers

PMID31005943
PMCPMC6500320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.