Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31005929›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Protocol for the Gut Bugs Trial: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of gut microbiome transfer for the treatment of obesity in adolescents.

Karen S W Leong, Thilini N Jayasinghe, José G B Derraik, Benjamin B Albert, Valentina Chiavaroli, Darren M Svirskis, Kathryn L Beck, Cathryn A Conlon, Yannan Jiang, William Schierding and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen S W LeongLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-8665
Thilini N JayasingheLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
José G B DerraikLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1226-1956
Benjamin B AlbertLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0498-3473
Valentina ChiavaroliLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0555-2173
Darren M SvirskisSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9435-1773
Kathryn L BeckSchool of Sport Exercise and Nutrition, College of Health, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1825-1927
Cathryn A ConlonSchool of Sport Exercise and Nutrition, College of Health, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Yannan JiangDepartment of Statistics, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7663-9164
William SchierdingLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5659-2701
Tommi VatanenLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0949-1291
David J HollandDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Justin M O'Sullivan *Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2927-450X
Wayne S Cutfield *Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6107-3682
University of Auckland · NZMassey University · NZBroad Institute · USCounties Manukau District Health Board · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnimal studies showed that germ-free mice inoculated with normal mouse gut bacteria developed obesity, insulin resistance and higher triglyceride levels, despite similar food intake. In humans, an association has been found between obesity and gut microbiome dysbiosis. However, gut microbiome transfer has not been evaluated for the treatment of human obesity. We will examine the effectiveness of gut microbiome transfer using encapsulated material for the treatment of obesity in adolescents. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A two-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial of a single course of gut microbiome transfer will be conducted in 80 obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was provided by the Northern A Health and Disability Ethics Committee (Ministry of Health, New Zealand; 16/NTA/172). The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615001351505; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexDouble-Blind MethodDysbiosisFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePediatric ObesityQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomeadolescentsclinical trialsmicrobiologyobesitypaediatric endocrinology

Identifiers

PMID31005929
PMCPMC6500264
OpenAlexW2937053426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.