Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31005921›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol.

Nadine Scholten, Tim Ohnhaeuser, Isabell Schellartz, Gero von Gersdorff, Martin Hellmich, Ute Karbach, Holger Pfaff, Christina Samel, Stephanie Stock, Katherine Rascher and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nadine ScholtenInstitute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
Tim OhnhaeuserInstitute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
Isabell SchellartzInstitute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
Gero von GersdorffDepartment II of Internal Medicine-QiN Group, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Martin HellmichInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ute KarbachInstitute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
Holger PfaffInstitute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
Christina SamelInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stephanie StockInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Katherine RascherDepartment II of Internal Medicine-QiN Group, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Thomas MettangDr Klaus-Ketzler-Zentrum, KfH-Nierenzentrum, Wiesbaden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with end-stage kidney failure can be treated either by transplant or by dialysis, which can be administered as haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Although they are equivalent therapeutic options in terms of mortality, the percentage of patients in Germany treated with PD is currently very low (∼6%) compared with other countries. The aim of our study is to analyse the factors behind this percentage and their relevance to the choice of dialysis treatment in Germany. This includes analyses of regional disparities in the provision of care for dialysis patients as well as the evaluations of costs and the influence of reimbursement structures. This approach should provide further insights to explain the variation in the usage of PD and HD and will help to define starting points for future interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods approach will be applied to several data sources, including administrative data (ambulatory physicians' claim data, statutory health insurance claim data), quality assurance data from one of the largest German dialysis providers Kuratorium für Dialyse (KfH) and qualitative and quantitative survey data (patients, nephrologists and dialysis nurses). Qualitative data will be analysed content-analytically. Based on the quantitative data, multivariable analyses will be performed and, where possible, hierarchical models will be tested. This multidimensional approach will enable us to account for the different factors influencing the penetration of PD in Germany. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval (17-299) has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne on 25 April 2018. National and international dissemination will be accomplished by informing healthcare practitioners, patients and professional organisations and other stakeholders via conferences, scientific and non-scientific publications and seminars. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00012555; Pre-Results.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMalePeritoneal DialysisSurveys and Questionnairesclaims datadialysishealth services researchqualitative researchquantitative researchstudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID31005921
PMCPMC6500214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.