Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31005579›Full record

ArticleCell systems2019

End-to-End Differentiable Learning of Protein Structure.

Mohammed AlQuraishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions from Machine-Learned Representations.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. How the technologies behind self-driving cars, social networks, ChatGPT, and DALL-E2 are changing structural biology.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Advances in artificial intelligence-based technologies for increasing the quality of medical products.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Machine learning in biological physics: From biomolecular prediction to design.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. On the role of native contact cooperativity in protein folding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohammed AlQuraishiLaboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: alquraishi@hms.harvard.edu.

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL PHARMACOLOGY COREP50GM107618 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI MALISZEWSKI, LAURA ELIZABETH · 2014 to 2018
$10.8M
Systems Pharmacology of Therapeutic and Adverse Responses to ImmuneCheckpoint and Small Molecule DrugsU54CA225088 · NCI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SORGER, PETER KARL · 2018 to 2022
$10.8M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA225088NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM107618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting protein structure from sequence is a central challenge of biochemistry. Co-evolution methods show promise, but an explicit sequence-to-structure map remains elusive. Advances in deep learning that replace complex, human-designed pipelines with differentiable models optimized end to end suggest the potential benefits of similarly reformulating structure prediction. Here, we introduce an end-to-end differentiable model for protein structure learning. The model couples local and global protein structure via geometric units that optimize global geometry without violating local covalent chemistry. We test our model using two challenging tasks: predicting novel folds without co-evolutionary data and predicting known folds without structural templates. In the first task, the model achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, and in the second, it comes within 1-2 Å; competing methods using co-evolution and experimental templates have been refined over many years, and it is likely that the differentiable approach has substantial room for further improvement, with applications ranging from drug discovery to protein design.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSoftwareEvolution, MolecularProtein FoldingSequence Analysis, Proteinbiophysicsco-evolutiondeep learninggeometric deep learninghomology modelingmachine learningprotein designprotein foldingprotein structure predictionstructural biology

Identifiers

PMID31005579
PMCPMC6513320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.