Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31005271›Full record

Trial reportKidney international2019

Cost-effectiveness of lipid lowering with statins and ezetimibe in chronic kidney disease.

Iryna Schlackow, Seamus Kent, William Herrington, Jonathan Emberson, Richard Haynes, Christina Reith, Rory Collins, Martin J Landray, Alastair Gray, Colin Baigent and 2 more

Open access · hybridFull text readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Kidney international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Is there a role for earlier use of combination therapy?American journal of preventive cardiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Iryna SchlackowHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Seamus KentHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
William HerringtonClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK; Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Jonathan EmbersonClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK; Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Richard HaynesClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK; Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Christina ReithClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Rory CollinsClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Martin J LandrayClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK; Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Alastair GrayHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Colin BaigentClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK; Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Borislava MihaylovaHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK; Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK. Electronic address: boby.mihaylova@dph.ox.ac.uk.
SHARP Collaborative Group
University of Oxford · GBQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/1996001/9454Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0701732Medical Research Council MC_U137686855Medical Research Council MR/R007764/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statin-based treatments reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD), but it is unclear which regimen is the most cost-effective. We used the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP) CKD-CVD policy model to evaluate the effect of statins and ezetimibe on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and health care costs in the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK). Net costs below $100,000/QALY (US) or £20,000/QALY (UK) were considered cost-effective. We investigated statin regimens with or without ezetimibe 10 mg. Treatment effects on cardiovascular risk were estimated per 1-mmol/L reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol as reported in the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration meta-analysis, and reductions in LDL cholesterol were estimated for each statin/ezetimibe regimen. In the US, atorvastatin 40 mg ($0.103/day as of January 2019) increased life expectancy by 0.23 to 0.31 QALYs in non-dialysis patients with stages 3B to 5 CKD, at a net cost of $20,300 to $78,200/QALY. Adding ezetimibe 10 mg ($0.203/day) increased life expectancy by an additional 0.05 to 0.07 QALYs, at a net cost of $43,600 to $91,500/QALY. The cost-effectiveness findings and policy implications in the UK were similar. In summary, in patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD, the evidence suggests that statin/ezetimibe combination therapy is a cost-effective treatment to reduce the risk of CVD.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLDrug Therapy, CombinationEzetimibeFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLife ExpectancyMaleMiddle AgedModels, EconomicQuality-Adjusted Life YearsCholesterol, LDLEzetimibeHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorschronic kidney diseasecost-effectivenessezetimibehealth care costsquality-adjusted life yearsstatin

Identifiers

PMID31005271
PMCPMC6595178
OpenAlexW2921754463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.