ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2019
Effect of setup and inter-fraction anatomical changes on the accumulated dose in CT-guided breath-hold intensity modulated proton therapy of liver malignancies.
Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Long-term experience in quality assurance of on-rail computed tomography systems for image-guided radiotherapy using in-house multifunctional phantoms.Radiological physics and technology · 2023Article
- Challenges and opportunities in stereotactic body proton radiotherapy of liver malignancies.Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT · 2023Article
- Evaluating Proton Dose and Associated Range Uncertainty Using Daily Cone-Beam CT.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Adaptive proton therapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Review
- Robust Angle Selection in Particle Therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Evaluation of OAR dose sparing and plan robustness of beam-specific PTV in lung cancer IMRT treatment.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2020Article
- Managing treatment-related uncertainties in proton beam radiotherapy for gastrointestinal cancers.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Review
- Evaluation of Intensity- and Contour-Based Deformable Image Registration Accuracy in Pancreatic Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2019Article
- Effect of setup and inter-fraction anatomical changes on the accumulated dose in CT-guided breath-hold intensity modulated proton therapy of liver malignancies.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2019Article
- Dosimetric Effect of Intrafraction Tumor Motion in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using CyberKnife Static Tracking System.Technology in cancer research & treatment · 2019Article
- Dosimetric Evaluation of Beam-specific PTV and Worst-case Optimization Methods for Liver Proton Therapy.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the effect of setup uncertainties including uncertainties between different breath holds (BH) and inter-fractional anatomical changes under CT-guided BH with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in patients with liver cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study considered 17 patients with liver tumors who underwent feedback-guided BH (FGBH) IMRT treatment with daily CT-on-rail imaging. Planning CT images were acquired at simulation using FGBH, and FGBH CT-on-rail images were also acquired prior to each treatment. Selective robust IMPT plans were generated using planning CT and re-calculated on each daily CT-on-rail image. Subsequently, the fractional doses were deformed and accumulated onto the planning CT according to the deformable image registration between daily and planning CTs. The doses to the target and organs at risk (OARs) were compared between IMRT, planned IMPT, and accumulated IMPT doses.
resultsFor IMPT plans, the mean of D
conclusionsIMPT with FGBH and CT-on-rail guidance is a robust treatment approach for liver tumor cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.