Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31005024›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2019

Neural organization of speech production: A lesion-based study of error patterns in connected speech.

Brielle C Stark, Alexandra Basilakos, Gregory Hickok, Chris Rorden, Leonardo Bonilha, Julius Fridriksson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Decoding concept representations in aphasia after stroke.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lesion mapping in neuropsychological research: A practical and conceptual guide.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brielle C StarkUniversity of South Carolina, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, United States; Indiana University, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, United States; Indiana University, Program in Neuroscience, United States. Electronic address: bcstark@iu.edu.
Alexandra BasilakosUniversity of South Carolina, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, United States.
Gregory HickokUniversity of California Irvine, Department of Cognitive Science, United States.
Chris RordenUniversity of South Carolina, Department of Psychology, United States.
Leonardo BonilhaMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Neurology, United States.
Julius FridrikssonUniversity of South Carolina, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, United States.

Funding

Telerehab for Aphasia (TERRA)P50DC014664 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS · 2016 to 2025
$25.0M
Treating Depression and Enhancing Locomotor Recovery Post-strokeP20GM109040 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KAUTZ, STEVEN A. · 2014 to 2024
$23.5M
Trans-cranial Direct Current Stimulation to Treat Aphasia: Phase II TrialU01DC011739 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS · 2012 to 2016
$4.4M
Interdisciplinary Research Training in Otolaryngology and Communication SciencesT32DC014435 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DUBNO, JUDY R · 2015 to 2024
$2.9M
Neural Predictors of Anomia Recovery in AphasiaR01DC008355 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC014664NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008355NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC014435NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC011739NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While numerous studies have explored single-word naming, few have evaluated the behavioral and neural correlates of more naturalistic language, like connected speech, which we produce every day. Here, in a retrospective analysis of 120 participants at least six months following left hemisphere stroke, we evaluated the distribution of word errors (paraphasias) and associated brain damage during connected speech (picture description) and object naming. While paraphasias in connected speech and naming shared underlying neural substrates, analysis of the distribution of paraphasias suggested that lexical-semantic load is likely reduced during connected speech. Using voxelwise lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM), we demonstrated that verbal (real word: semantically related and unrelated) and sound (phonemic and neologistic) paraphasias during both connected speech and naming loaded onto the left hemisphere ventral and dorsal streams of language, respectively. Furthermore, for the first time using both connected speech and naming data, we localized semantically related paraphasias to more anterior left hemisphere temporal cortex and unrelated paraphasias to more posterior left temporal and temporoparietal cortex. The connected speech results, in particular, highlight a gradient of specificity as one translates visual recognition from left temporo-occipital cortex to posterior and subsequently anterior temporal cortex. The robustness of VLSM results for sound paraphasias derived during connected speech was notable, in that analyses performed on sound paraphasias from the connected speech task, and not the naming task, demonstrated significant results following removal of lesion volume variance and related apraxia of speech variance. Therefore, connected speech may be a particularly sensitive task on which to evaluate further lexical-phonological processing in the brain. The results presented here demonstrate the related, though different, distribution of paraphasias during connected speech, confirm that paraphasias arising in connected speech and single-word naming likely share neural origins, and endorse the need for continued evaluation of the neural substrates of connected speech processes.

Indexed as

LanguageAdultAgedAphasiaBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetNeural PathwaysNeuropsychological TestsSpeechStrokeAphasiaDiscourseLanguageLesionStroke

Identifiers

PMID31005024
PMCPMC6650360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.