Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31004408›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2019

Optimizing Donor Cellular Dissociation and Subretinal Injection Parameters for Stem Cell-Based Treatments.

Brittni A Scruggs, Chunhua Jiao, Cathryn M Cranston, Emily Kaalberg, Kai Wang, Stephen R Russell, Luke A Wiley, Robert F Mullins, Edwin M Stone, Budd A Tucker and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brittni A ScruggsUniversity of Iowa Institute for Vision Research and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8806-1438
Chunhua JiaoUniversity of Iowa Institute for Vision Research and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Cathryn M CranstonUniversity of Iowa Institute for Vision Research and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Emily KaalbergUniversity of Iowa Institute for Vision Research and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Kai WangDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Stephen R RussellUniversity of Iowa Institute for Vision Research and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Luke A WileyUniversity of Iowa Institute for Vision Research and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Robert F MullinsUniversity of Iowa Institute for Vision Research and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Edwin M StoneUniversity of Iowa Institute for Vision Research and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Budd A TuckerUniversity of Iowa Institute for Vision Research and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2178-1742
Elliott H SohnUniversity of Iowa Institute for Vision Research and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3778-9362
University of Iowa · US

Funding

Stem Cell and Organoid CoreP30EY025580 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Michael G Anderson, Robert Foster Mullins · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
Choroidal Disease Mechanisms in AMDR01EY026547 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SOHN, ELLIOTT H · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY025580NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subretinal delivery of stem cell-derived retinal cells as a strategy to treat retinal degenerative blindness holds great promise. Currently, two clinical trials are underway in which human fetal retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) are being delivered to patients by intravitreal or subretinal injection to preserve or restore vision, respectively. With the advent of the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC), and in turn three-dimensional derivation of retinal tissue, it is now possible to generate autologous RPCs for cell replacement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of commonly used cell isolation and surgical manipulation strategies on donor cell viability. iPSC-RPCs were subjected to various conditions, including different dissociation and isolation methods, injection cannula sizes, and preinjection storage temperatures and times. The effects of commonly used surgical techniques on both host and donor cell viability were evaluated in Yucatan mini-pigs (n = 61 eyes). We found a significant increase in cell viability when papain was used for RPC isolation. In addition, a significant decrease in cell viability was detected when using the 41G cannula compared with 31G and at storage times of 4 hours compared with 30 minutes. Although 96.4% of all eyes demonstrated spontaneous retinal reattachment following injection, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) abnormalities were seen more frequently in eyes receiving injections via a 31G cannula; interestingly, eyes that received cell suspensions were relatively protected against such RPE changes. These findings indicate that optimization of donor cell isolation and delivery parameters should be considered when developing a subretinal cell replacement strategy. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2019;8:797&809.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedCell SurvivalCellular Reprogramming TechniquesHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsNeural Stem CellsPapainPrimary Cell CultureRetinaRetinal DystrophiesStem Cell TransplantationSwineSwine, MiniaturePapainInduced pluripotent stem cellsInherited retinal dystrophyPig modelRetinal progenitor cellsStem cell transplantationSubretinal transplantation

Identifiers

PMID31004408
PMCPMC6646699
OpenAlexW2935957702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.