Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31004336›Full record

ArticleFood and environmental virology2019

Missing the Match Might Not Cost You the Game: Primer-Template Mismatches Studied in Different Hepatitis A Virus Variants.

Sofia Persson, Måns Karlsson, Henrik Borsch-Reniers, Patrik Ellström, Ronnie Eriksson, Magnus Simonsson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Food and environmental virology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observation Bias in Metabarcoding.Molecular ecology resources · 2025
    Article
  3. Reality check: testing theFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. RT-qPCR Diagnostics: The "Drosten" SARS-CoV-2 Assay Paradigm.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sofia PerssonEuropean Union Reference Laboratory (EURL) for Foodborne Viruses, National Food Agency, Hamnesplanaden 5, 453 23, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2611-3030
Måns KarlssonDepartment of Mathematics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9662-507X
Henrik Borsch-ReniersSouthern Roslagen Environmental and Health Authorities, Täby, Sweden.
Patrik EllströmDepartment of Medical Sciences, Zoonosis Science Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8920-6061
Ronnie ErikssonEuropean Union Reference Laboratory (EURL) for Foodborne Viruses, National Food Agency, Hamnesplanaden 5, 453 23, Uppsala, Sweden.
Magnus SimonssonEuropean Union Reference Laboratory (EURL) for Foodborne Viruses, National Food Agency, Hamnesplanaden 5, 453 23, Uppsala, Sweden. magnus.simonsson@slv.se.ORCID 0000-0001-8235-6905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mismatches between template sequences and reverse transcription (RT) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers can lead to underestimation or false negative results during detection and quantification of sequence-diverse viruses. We performed an in silico inclusivity analysis of a widely used RT-PCR assay for detection of hepatitis A virus (HAV) in food, described in ISO 15216-1. One of the most common mismatches found was a single G (primer) to U (template) mismatch located at the terminal 3'-end of the reverse primer region. This mismatch was present in all genotype III sequences available in GenBank. Partial HAV genomes with common or potentially severe mismatches were produced by in vitro transcription and analysed using RT-ddPCR and RT-qPCR. When using standard conditions for RT-qPCR, the mismatch identified resulted in underestimation of the template concentration by a factor of 1.7-1.8 and an increase in 95% limit of detection from 8.6 to 19 copies/reaction. The effect of this mismatch was verified using full-length viral genomes. Here, the same mismatch resulted in underestimation of the template concentration by a factor of 2.8. For the partial genomes, the presence of additional mismatches resulted in underestimation of the template concentration by up to a factor of 232. Quantification by RT-ddPCR and RT-qPCR was equally affected during analysis of RNA templates with mismatches within the reverse primer region. However, on analysing DNA templates with the same mismatches, we found that ddPCR quantification was less affected by mismatches than qPCR due to the end-point detection technique.

Indexed as

Base SequenceDNA PrimersDNA, ViralFoodGenotypeHepatitis A virusReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTemplates, GeneticDNA PrimersDNA, ViralDigital PCRHepatitis A virusMismatchPrimerReal-time PCRReverse transcription

Identifiers

PMID31004336
PMCPMC6689102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.