Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31004212›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2019

Update on narcolepsy.

P J Reading

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

P J ReadingDepartment of Neurology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW, UK. p.reading@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5277-0942
James Cook University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last two decades have seen an explosion in our understanding of the clinical nature of narcolepsy and its pathogenesis, fuelling new approaches to potentially effective treatments. It is now recognised that the full narcoleptic syndrome has significant adverse effects on sleep regulation across the full 24-h period and is often associated with clinical features outside the sleep-wake domain. The discovery that most narcoleptic subjects specifically lack a hypothalamic neuropeptide (hypocretin, also called orexin) was a truly original and landmark observation in 1999, greatly furthering our understanding both of the syndrome itself and sleep biology in general. An autoimmune pathophysiology has long been suggested by the tight association with specific histocompatibility antigens and very recently partly confirmed by detailed analysis of T-cell immunological function in affected subjects. Drug treatments remain symptomatic but may soon become more focussed by restoring central hypocretin signalling with replacement therapy. Potentially disease-modifying, immunological approaches have yet to be studied systematically, although the interval between disease onset and development of the full clinical syndrome may be longer than previously appreciated, affording a realistic window of opportunity for limiting neuronal damage in this disabling condition.

Indexed as

BrainEmotionsHumansNarcolepsyNerve NetOrexinsHCRT protein, humanOrexinsAutoimmunityCataplexyHypocretinNarcolepsy

Identifiers

PMID31004212
OpenAlexW2937303977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.