Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31004210›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2019

Antibiotic therapy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Daniela Prechal, Fuad Damirov, Maurizio Grilli, Ulrich Ronellenfitsch

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Rate of Application and Outcome of Non-operative Management of Acute Appendicitis in the Setting of COVID-19: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Acute Appendicitis in Childhood and Adulthood.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of appendiceal disease.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Adapting an emergency general surgery service in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela PrechalMedical Faculty Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1758-8894
Fuad DamirovDepartment of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, University Medical Center Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Maurizio GrilliDepartment of Library and Information Sciences, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, University Medical Center Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Ulrich RonellenfitschDepartment of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. ulrich.ronellenfitsch@uk-halle.de.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital in Halle · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAppendectomy has been the gold standard for every form of appendicitis. In recent years, though, it has repeatedly been claimed that for acute uncomplicated appendicitis, antibiotic therapy can be an equivalent treatment. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine if antibiotic therapy is a safe and effective alternative to appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis.

methodsIn a systematic literature review, relevant databases were searched for randomized studies comparing appendectomy with antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. The primary endpoint was the successful treatment of appendicitis. Secondary endpoints were pain intensity, duration of hospitalization, absence from work, and the incidence of complications.

resultsFive randomized controlled studies (n = 1430 patients) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of the 727 patients treated initially with antibiotics, 272 (37.4%) underwent secondary appendectomy within 1 year (treatment effectiveness: 62.6% compared to 96.3% in the surgical group, RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.76, p < 0.00001). Neither duration of hospital stay (MD 0.11 days, 95% CI: - 0.22-0.43, p = 0.53) nor the probability of complication-free treatment (RR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.97-1.22, p = 0.16) were significantly different between the two treatments. Absence from work was significantly shorter in the antibiotic group (MD - 2.49 days, 95% CI: - 4.59-- 0.40, p = 0.02).

conclusionsThis meta-analysis shows that appendectomy is more effective than antibiotic therapy for definitive cure of acute uncomplicated appendicitis. However, since the incidence of complications does not differ between the two treatments, antibiotic therapy might be a reasonable alternative for selected patients.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnti-Bacterial AgentsAppendicitisHumansLength of StayPainPostoperative ComplicationsPublication BiasTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAcute uncomplicated appendicitisAntibiotic therapyConservative treatmentMeta-analysisNon-operative treatmentSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31004210
OpenAlexW2940229393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.