Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31004125›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Right hemisphere occipital rTMS impairs working memory in visualizers but not in verbalizers.

Sven Hilbert, Michaela McAssey, Markus Bühner, Patrick Schwaferts, Monika Gruber, Stephan Goerigk, Paul Christopher John Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sven HilbertFaculty of Psychology, Educational Science, and Sport Science, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. sven.hilbert@ur.de.
Michaela McAsseyDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Markus BühnerDepartment of Psychology, Psychological Methods and Assessment, LMU Munich, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802, München, Germany.
Patrick SchwafertsInstitute of Statistics, Methodological Foundations of Statistics and its Applications, Ludwigstraße 33, 80539, München, Germany.
Monika GruberDepartment of Psychology, Psychological Methods and Assessment, LMU Munich, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802, München, Germany.
Stephan GoerigkDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Paul Christopher John TaylorDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0250-2915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distinguishing between verbal and visual working memory processes is complicated by the fact that the strategy used is hard to control or even assess. Many stimuli used in working memory tasks can be processed via verbal or visual coding, such as the digits in the digit span backwards task (DSB). The present study used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to examine the use of visual processing strategies in the DSB. A total of 47 German university students took part in the study, 23 spontaneously using a verbal processing strategy and 24 using a visual strategy. After rTMS to the right occipital cortex, visualizers showed a significantly stronger mean performance decrease compared to verbalizers. The results indicate that the visual cortex is more critical for visualizers compared to verbalizers in the DSB task. Furthermore, the favored processing modality seems to be determined by the preference for a cognitive strategy rather than the presentation modality, and people are aware of the applied strategy. These findings provide insight into inter-individual differences in working memory processing and yield important implications for laboratory studies as well as clinical practice: the stimulus does not necessarily determine the processing and the participant can be aware of that.

Indexed as

Functional LateralityMemory, Short-TermOccipital LobePrefrontal CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationVerbal BehaviorAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID31004125
PMCPMC6474855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.