Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31004100›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Simple fluorometric-based assay of antibiotic effectiveness for Acinetobacter baumannii biofilms.

Dhammika Leshan Wannigama, Cameron Hurst, Lachlan Pearson, Thammakorn Saethang, Uthaibhorn Singkham-In, Sirirat Luk-In, Robin James Storer, Tanittha Chatsuwan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Novel Method to Monitor the Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Drug design, development and therapy · 2024
    Article
  7. Characterization of aFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Prognostic Factors That Affect Mortality Patients withInfection and drug resistance · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Dhammika Leshan WannigamaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Cameron HurstCenter of Excellence in Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Lachlan PearsonSystems Biology Center, Research Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thammakorn SaethangSystems Biology Center, Research Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Uthaibhorn Singkham-InDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sirirat Luk-InDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Robin James StorerOffice of Research Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0157-2919
Tanittha ChatsuwanDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Tanittha.C@chula.ac.th.
Chulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite strengthened antimicrobial therapy, biofilm infections of Acinetobacter baumannii are associated with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Assessing antibiotics on planktonic bacteria can result in failure against biofilm infections. Currently, antibiotics to treat biofilm infections are administered empirically, usually without considering the susceptibility of the biofilm objectively before beginning treatment. For effective therapy to resolve biofilm infections it is essential to assess the efficacy of commonly used antibiotics against biofilms. Here, we offer a robust and simple assay to assess the efficacy of antibiotics against biofilms. In the present work, we carefully optimized the incubation time, detection range, and fluorescence reading mode for resazurin-based viability staining of biofilms in 96-well-plates and determined minimal biofilm eradication concentrations (MBECs) for A. baumannii isolates from patients with chronic infection. By applying this assay, we demonstrated that antibiotic response patterns varied uniquely within the biofilm formation of various clinical samples. MBEC-50 and 75 have significant discriminatory power over minimum inhibitory concentrations for planktonic suspensions to differentiate the overall efficiency of an antibiotic to eradicate a biofilm. The present assay is an ideal platform on which to assess the efficacy of antibiotics against biofilms in vitro to pave the way for more effective therapy.

Indexed as

FluorometryAcinetobacter baumanniiAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsHumansOxazinesXanthenesAnti-Bacterial AgentsOxazinesresazurinXanthenes

Identifiers

PMID31004100
PMCPMC6474882
OpenAlexW2937584374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.