Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31004061›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Data gaps and opportunities for comparative and conservation biology.

Dalia A Conde, Johanna Staerk, Fernando Colchero, Rita da Silva, Jonas Schöley, H Maria Baden, Lionel Jouvet, Julia E Fa, Hassan Syed, Eelke Jongejans and 23 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Environmental drivers of productivity explain population patterns of an Arctic-nesting bird across a half-century.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Wild capuchin monkeys as a model system for investigating the social and ecological determinants of ageing.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Dalia A CondeSpecies360 Conservation Science Alliance, Bloomington, MN 55425; dalia.conde@species360.org jvaupel@sdu.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-7923-8163
Johanna StaerkSpecies360 Conservation Science Alliance, Bloomington, MN 55425.ORCID 0000-0001-6965-019X
Fernando ColcheroInterdisciplinary Center on Population Dynamics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8613-4568
Rita da SilvaSpecies360 Conservation Science Alliance, Bloomington, MN 55425.
Jonas SchöleyInterdisciplinary Center on Population Dynamics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
H Maria BadenInterdisciplinary Center on Population Dynamics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
Lionel JouvetInterdisciplinary Center on Population Dynamics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
Julia E FaDivision of Biology and Conservation Ecology, School of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M15 6BH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3611-8487
Hassan SyedBir Ventures, Bloomington, MN 55425.
Eelke JongejansDepartment of Animal Ecology and Physiology, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1148-7419
Shai MeiriDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel.
Jean-Michel GaillardDépartement de Génie Biologique, University of Lyon, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0174-8451
Scott ChamberlainrOpenSci, University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Jonathan WilckenAuckland Zoo, Auckland 1022, New Zealand.
Owen R JonesInterdisciplinary Center on Population Dynamics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5720-4686
Johan P DahlgrenInterdisciplinary Center on Population Dynamics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
Ulrich K SteinerInterdisciplinary Center on Population Dynamics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1778-5989
Lucie M BlandSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Ivan Gomez-MestreEstación Biológica de Doñana, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, 41092 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0094-8195
Jean-Dominique LebretonCNRS, Centre d'écologie fonctionnelle et évolutive, UMR 5175 1919, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Jaime González VargasAbiztar Learning Technologies, SC, Tlalpan, 14350 Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1087-3548
Nate FlesnessSpecies360 Conservation Science Alliance, Bloomington, MN 55425.
Vladimir Canudas-RomoSchool of Demography, College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6532-0089
Roberto Salguero-GómezDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, OX2 6GG Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6085-4433
Onnie ByersConservation Breeding Specialist Group, Species Survival Commission, Internation Union for Conservation of Nature, Minneapolis, MN 55124.
Thomas Bjørneboe BergNaturama, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0737-1229
Alexander ScheuerleinMax Planck Institute for Demographic Research, D-18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1310-5648
Sébastien DevillardDépartement de Génie Biologique, University of Lyon, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France.
Dmitry S SchigelGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Oliver A RyderSan Diego Zoo Global Institute for Conservation Research, Escondido, CA 92027.
Hugh P PossinghamAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Annette BaudischInterdisciplinary Center on Population Dynamics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
James W VaupelInterdisciplinary Center on Population Dynamics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark; dalia.conde@species360.org jvaupel@sdu.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-0783-3905

Funding

THE RANGE OF MALE-FEMALE MORTALITY DIFFERENCESP01AG031719 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ZENG, YI · 2009 to 2020
$10.2M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG031719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity loss is a major challenge. Over the past century, the average rate of vertebrate extinction has been about 100-fold higher than the estimated background rate and population declines continue to increase globally. Birth and death rates determine the pace of population increase or decline, thus driving the expansion or extinction of a species. Design of species conservation policies hence depends on demographic data (e.g., for extinction risk assessments or estimation of harvesting quotas). However, an overview of the accessible data, even for better known taxa, is lacking. Here, we present the Demographic Species Knowledge Index, which classifies the available information for 32,144 (97%) of extant described mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians. We show that only 1.3% of the tetrapod species have comprehensive information on birth and death rates. We found no demographic measures, not even crude ones such as maximum life span or typical litter/clutch size, for 65% of threatened tetrapods. More field studies are needed; however, some progress can be made by digitalizing existing knowledge, by imputing data from related species with similar life histories, and by using information from captive populations. We show that data from zoos and aquariums in the Species360 network can significantly improve knowledge for an almost eightfold gain. Assessing the landscape of limited demographic knowledge is essential to prioritize ways to fill data gaps. Such information is urgently needed to implement management strategies to conserve at-risk taxa and to discover new unifying concepts and evolutionary relationships across thousands of tetrapod species.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBiological EvolutionConservation of Natural ResourcesExtinction, BiologicalAnimalsVertebratesbiodemographyDemographic Species Knowledge Indexextinctionfertilitymortality

Identifiers

PMID31004061
PMCPMC6511006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.