Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31003985›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2019

Honeybee-Specific Lactic Acid Bacterium Supplements Have No Effect on American Foulbrood-Infected Honeybee Colonies.

Jörg G Stephan, Sepideh Lamei, Jeffery S Pettis, Kristian Riesbeck, Joachim R de Miranda, Eva Forsgren

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Prospects for probiotics in social bees.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Characterization ofCells · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jörg G Stephan *Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden jorg.stephan@slu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-6195-7867
Sepideh Lamei *Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7587-8040
Jeffery S PettisUSDA ARS, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center-East, Beltsville, Maryland, USA.
Kristian RiesbeckClinical Microbiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6274-6965
Joachim R de MirandaDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0335-0386
Eva ForsgrenDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8244-7265
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SELund University · SEBeltsville Agricultural Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AntibiosisAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBeesLactobacillalesLarvaPaenibacillus larvaeSpecies SpecificityTylosinAnti-Bacterial AgentsTylosinAmerican foulbroodApis melliferaBifidobacteriumenzootic diseasehoneybeeshoneybee-specific lactic acid bacteriahost-pathogen dynamicsLactobacillusPaenibacillus larvaetylosin

Identifiers

PMID31003985
PMCPMC6581185
OpenAlexW2936697221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.