Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31003709›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2019

Ultrasound-Stimulated Phase-Change Contrast Agents for Transepithelial Delivery of Macromolecules, Toward Gastrointestinal Drug Delivery.

Samantha M Fix, Bhanu P Koppolu, Anthony Novell, Jared Hopkins, Thomas M Kierski, David A Zaharoff, Paul A Dayton, Virginie Papadopoulou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ultrasound-Mediated Antibiotic Delivery to In Vivo Biofilm Infections: A Review.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samantha M FixEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Bhanu P KoppoluJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Anthony NovellIR4M, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR 8081, 91401 Orsay, France.
Jared HopkinsJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Thomas M KierskiJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
David A ZaharoffJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Paul A DaytonEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Virginie PapadopoulouJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: papadopoulou@unc.edu.

Funding

Image-guided, sonoporation-enhanced immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer treatmentF31CA220970 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FIX, SAMANTHA MARIE · 2017 to 2018
$52k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA220970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract presents a notoriously difficult barrier for macromolecular drug delivery, especially for biologics. Herein, we demonstrate that ultrasound-stimulated phase change contrast agents (PCCAs) can transiently disrupt confluent colorectal adenocarcinoma monolayers and improve the transepithelial transport of a macromolecular model drug. With ultrasound treatment in the presence of PCCAs, we achieved a maximum of 44 ± 15% transepithelial delivery of 70-kDa fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran, compared with negligible delivery through sham control monolayers. Among all tested rarefactional pressures (300-600 kPa), dextran delivery efficiency was consistently greatest at 300 kPa. To explore this unexpected finding, we quantified stable and inertial cavitation energy generated by various ultrasound exposure conditions. In general, lower pressures resulted in more persistent cavitation activity during the 30-s ultrasound exposures, which may explain the enhanced dextran delivery efficiency. Thus, a unique advantage of using low boiling point PCCAs for this application is that the same low-pressure pulses can be used to induce vaporization and provide maximal delivery.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaCells, CulturedDextransDrug Delivery SystemsFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateGastrointestinal AgentsHumansImage EnhancementIn Vitro TechniquesUltrasonographyContrast MediaDextransFluorescein-5-isothiocyanatefluorescein isothiocyanate dextranGastrointestinal AgentsAcoustic droplet vaporizationNanodropletPhase-change contrast agentsTransepithelial deliveryUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID31003709
PMCPMC6701470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.