Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31003659›Full record

SynthesisComplementary therapies in clinical practice2019

Acceptability of mindfulness-based interventions for substance use disorder: A systematic review.

Tara Bautista, Dara James, Hortensia Amaro

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Complementary therapies in clinical practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tara BautistaArizona State University, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, USA. Electronic address: tara.bautista@asu.edu.
Dara JamesArizona State University, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, USA.
Hortensia AmaroFlorida International University, Wertheim College of Medicine and Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, USA.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Training Institute on Hispanic Drug AbuseR25DA026401 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VALDEZ, AVELARDO · 2009 to 2019
$3.2M
The Effects of Social Networks on Women's Substance Use Disorder Recovery OutcomesR01DA038648 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI AMARO, HORTENSIA D., BLACK, DAVID SCOTT · 2015 to 2018
$2.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038648NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA026401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundand Purpose: Mindfulness-based interventions (MBI) for substance use disorders (SUD) have shown promising results. However, acceptability of MBIs in the context of SUD treatment has yet to be systematically assessed across published studies. Our aims were to (a) review the literature for assessments of acceptability; (b) summarize how, when, and for whom acceptability is being measured; and (c) create suggestions for best practices in measuring acceptability of MBIs for SUD.

methodsFive databases were searched with key terms related to mindfulness, relapse prevention, and SUD.

resultsResults highlight that studies of MBIs for SUD treatment lack acceptability assessment, a consistent definition of acceptability, and standardized measurements of acceptability.

conclusionThe lack of measurement and conceptual consistency make it difficult to conclude acceptability of MBIs for SUD treatment. It is imperative that more efforts be directed toward measurement of intervention acceptability to assess whether such interventions could be taken to scale.

Indexed as

HumansMindfulnessSubstance-Related DisordersAcceptability frameworkMeasurementMindfulness-based interventionsMindfulness-based relapse preventionSubstance use disorderTreatment acceptability

Identifiers

PMID31003659
PMCPMC6478439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.