Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31003116›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2019

Redaction of false high frequency oscillations due to muscle artifact improves specificity to epileptic tissue.

Sijin Ren, Stephen V Gliske, David Brang, William C Stacey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Networks through the lens of high-frequency oscillations.Frontiers in network physiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sijin RenDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan, USA. Electronic address: sijinren@umich.edu.
Stephen V GliskeDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, USA. Electronic address: sgliske@umich.edu.
David BrangDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, USA. Electronic address: djbrang@umich.edu.
William C StaceyDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, USA. Electronic address: william.stacey@umich.edu.
BioSurfaces (United States) · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Characterizing High Frequency Oscillations as an epilepsy biomarker with Big Data toolsR01NS094399 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STACEY, WILLIAM CHARLES · 2015 to 2025
$4.1M
Networks Underlying Visual Modulation of Speech PerceptionR00DC013828 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BRANG, DAVID · 2016 to 2018
$747k
Epileptic biomarkers and big data: identifying brain regions to resect in patients with refractory epilepsyK01ES026839 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GLISKE, STEPHEN V · 2015 to 2019
$734k
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation 2015096NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC013828NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES026839NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHigh Frequency Oscillations (HFOs) are a promising biomarker of epilepsy. HFOs are typically acquired on intracranial electrodes, but contamination from muscle artifacts is still problematic in HFO analysis. This paper evaluates the effect of myogenic artifacts on intracranial HFO detection and how to remove them.

methodsIntracranial EEG was recorded in 31 patients. HFOs were detected for the entire recording using an automated algorithm. When available, simultaneous scalp EEG was used to identify periods of muscle artifact. Those markings were used to train an automated scalp EMG detector and an intracranial EMG detector. Specificity to epileptic tissue was evaluated by comparison with seizure onset zone and resected volume in patients with good outcome.

resultsEMG artifacts are frequent and produce large numbers of false HFOs, especially in the anterior temporal lobe. The scalp and intracranial EMG detectors both had high accuracy. Removing false HFOs improved specificity to epileptic tissue.

conclusionsEvaluation of HFOs requires accounting for the effect of muscle artifact. We present two tools that effectively mitigate the effect of muscle artifact on HFOs. SIGNIFICANCE: Removing muscle artifacts improves the specificity of HFOs to epileptic tissue. Future HFO work should account for this effect, especially when using automated algorithms or when scalp electrodes are not present.

Indexed as

ArtifactsElectroencephalographyElectromyographyEpilepsyHumansMuscle, SkeletalAlgorithmsEEGEpilepsyHigh Frequency OscillationsMuscle artifacts

Identifiers

PMID31003116
PMCPMC6551620
OpenAlexW2938155802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.