Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31002854›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2019

An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading.

Joshua Snell, Gabriela Meade, Martijn Meeter, Phillip Holcomb, Jonathan Grainger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. On the spatial limits of parallel word processing in reading.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Attention extends beyond single words in beginning readers.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua SnellLaboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, Aix-Marseille University & CNRS, France. Electronic address: Joshua.Snell@hotmail.com.
Gabriela MeadeJoint Doctoral Program in Language and Communicative Disorders, San Diego State University & University of California, San Diego, United States.
Martijn MeeterDepartment of Educational Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Phillip HolcombDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States.
Jonathan GraingerLaboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, Aix-Marseille University & CNRS, France.

Funding

The Neuro-cognition of Word ComprehensionR37HD025889 · NICHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI HOLCOMB, PHILLIP J · 2011 to 2020
$3.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD025889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During reading, word recognition speed is influenced by the amount of orthographic overlap with surrounding words. The nature of this phenomenon is not understood: some theories attribute it to low-level visual operations (i.e., parafoveal feature detectors influencing foveal letter detectors), whereas other theories assume that orthographic processing (i.e., letter position coding and word activation) occurs across multiple words in parallel. To arbitrate between these theories, we used electroencephalography to reveal the time course of orthographic spatial integration in a lexical decision task. Foveal target words were flanked on each side by parafoveal words, manipulated across three conditions: repetition flankers (e.g. rock rock rock), unrelated flankers (step rock step) and a no-flanker condition. Linear mixed-effect models were constructed to analyze EEG data on a trial-by-trial basis. Word recognition was worse in the unrelated flanker condition than in the repetition and no-flanker conditions. This behavioral pattern was accompanied by increased negativity in the N250 and N400 windows, associated with the activation of sub-lexical and lexico-semantic representations, respectively. Crucially, the absence of effects prior to 200 ms post-stimulus onset provides evidence against the involvement of low-level visual processes. We conclude that orthographic spatial integration is driven by parallel processing of multiple words, which leads to the activation of a larger set of sub-lexical nodes and more difficult processing at the lexical level when those words are orthographically unrelated.

Indexed as

ReadingAdolescentAdultBrainElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationReaction TimeSpatial ProcessingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31002854
PMCPMC6582630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.