ArticleMedical physics2019
Shape constrained fully convolutional DenseNet with adversarial training for multiorgan segmentation on head and neck CT and low-field MR images.
Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Towards more precise automatic analysis: a systematic review of deep learning-based multi-organ segmentation.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence applied to image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT): a systematic review by the Young Group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (yAIRO).La Radiologia medica · 2024Pooled it
- Deep learning algorithm performance in contouring head and neck organs at risk: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Pooled it
- Geometric Fidelity of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography-Derived Virtual 3D Models of Porcine Cadaver Mandibles: Conventional Versus Artificial Intelligence-Based Segmentation.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2025Article
- Article
- MUsculo-Skeleton-Aware (MUSA) deep learning for anatomically guided head-and-neck CT deformable registration.Medical image analysis · 2025Article
- Parotid Gland Segmentation Using Purely Transformer-Based U-Shaped Network and Multimodal MRI.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- The Use of MR-Guided Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer and Recommended Reporting Guidance.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- Deep-learning magnetic resonance imaging-based automatic segmentation for organs-at-risk in the brain: Accuracy and impact on dose distribution.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Symmetrical awareness network for cross-site ultrasound thyroid nodule segmentation.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Computational approaches for the reconstruction of optic nerve fibers along the visual pathway from medical images: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Validation of clinical acceptability of deep-learning-based automated segmentation of organs-at-risk for head-and-neck radiotherapy treatment planning.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- The role of generative adversarial networks in brain MRI: a scoping review.Insights into imaging · 2022Article
- Attention-guided duplex adversarial U-net for pancreatic segmentation from computed tomography images.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- The use of deep learning technology for the detection of optic neuropathy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Review
- Multi-organ auto-delineation in head-and-neck MRI for radiation therapy using regional convolutional neural network.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- An attention base U-net for parotid tumor autosegmentation.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Geometric and Dosimetric Evaluation of the Automatic Delineation of Organs at Risk (OARs) in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Radiotherapy Based on a Modified DenseNet Deep Learning Network.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Generative adversarial networks and its applications in the biomedical image segmentation: a comprehensive survey.International journal of multimedia information retrieval · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeImage-guided radiotherapy provides images not only for patient positioning but also for online adaptive radiotherapy. Accurate delineation of organs-at-risk (OARs) on Head and Neck (H&N) CT and MR images is valuable to both initial treatment planning and adaptive planning, but manual contouring is laborious and inconsistent. A novel method based on the generative adversarial network (GAN) with shape constraint (SC-GAN) is developed for fully automated H&N OARs segmentation on CT and low-field MRI. METHODS AND MATERIAL: A deep supervised fully convolutional DenseNet is employed as the segmentation network for voxel-wise prediction. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-based discriminator network is then utilized to correct predicted errors and image-level inconsistency between the prediction and ground truth. An additional shape representation loss between the prediction and ground truth in the latent shape space is integrated into the segmentation and adversarial loss functions to reduce false positivity and constrain the predicted shapes. The proposed segmentation method was first benchmarked on a public H&N CT database including 32 patients, and then on 25 0.35T MR images obtained from an MR-guided radiotherapy system. The OARs include brainstem, optical chiasm, larynx (MR only), mandible, pharynx (MR only), parotid glands (both left and right), optical nerves (both left and right), and submandibular glands (both left and right, CT only). The performance of the proposed SC-GAN was compared with GAN alone and GAN with the shape constraint (SC) but without the DenseNet (SC-GAN-ResNet) to quantify the contributions of shape constraint and DenseNet in the deep neural network segmentation.
resultsThe proposed SC-GAN slightly but consistently improve the segmentation accuracy on the benchmark H&N CT images compared with our previous deep segmentation network, which outperformed other published methods on the same or similar CT H&N dataset. On the low-field MR dataset, the following average Dice's indices were obtained using improved SC-GAN: 0.916 (brainstem), 0.589 (optical chiasm), 0.816 (mandible), 0.703 (optical nerves), 0.799 (larynx), 0.706 (pharynx), and 0.845 (parotid glands). The average surface distances ranged from 0.68 mm (brainstem) to 1.70 mm (larynx). The 95% surface distance ranged from 1.48 mm (left optical nerve) to 3.92 mm (larynx). Compared with CT, using 95% surface distance evaluation, the automated segmentation accuracy is higher on MR for the brainstem, optical chiasm, optical nerves and parotids, and lower for the mandible. The SC-GAN performance is superior to SC-GAN-ResNet, which is more accurate than GAN alone on both the CT and MR datasets. The segmentation time for one patient is 14 seconds using a single GPU.
conclusionThe performance of our previous shape constrained fully CNNs for H&N segmentation is further improved by incorporating GAN and DenseNet. With the novel segmentation method, we showed that the low-field MR images acquired on a MR-guided radiation radiotherapy system can support accurate and fully automated segmentation of both bony and soft tissue OARs for adaptive radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.