Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31002174›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2019

Epigenetic dynamics during flowering plant reproduction: evidence for reprogramming?

Mary Gehring

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
20.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recreating viable YYNature communications · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Transgenerational Paternal Inheritance ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary GehringWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2280-1522
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research · US

Funding

Regulation of DNA methylation homeostasis in ArabidopsisR01GM112851 · NIGMS · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI GEHRING, MARY · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last 10 yr there have been major advances in documenting and understanding dynamic changes to DNA methylation, small RNAs, chromatin modifications and chromatin structure that accompany reproductive development in flowering plants, from germline specification to seed maturation. Here I highlight recent advances in the field, mostly made possible by microscopic analysis of epigenetic states or by the ability to isolate specific cell types or tissues and apply omics approaches. I consider in which contexts there is potentially reprogramming vs maintenance or reinforcement of epigenetic states.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticCellular ReprogrammingChromatinGametogenesis, PlantMagnoliopsidaReproductionChromatinDNA methylationembryoendospermepigenetic reprogrammingfemale gametophyteplant reproductionpollen

Identifiers

PMID31002174
PMCPMC6711810
OpenAlexW2936335334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.