Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31002111›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2019

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 alone or in combination with antibiotic growth promoters improves performance in broilers under enteric pathogen challenge.

Marllon José Karpeggiane de Oliveira, Nilva Kazue Sakomura, Juliano Cesar de Paula Dorigam, Kiran Doranalli, Letícia Soares, Gabriel da Silva Viana

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. ProbioticMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Dietary Use of Methionine Sources andAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  9. The Effects of DietaryAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marllon José Karpeggiane de OliveiraDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita, Filho", FCAV/UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo 14884-900, Brazil.
Nilva Kazue SakomuraDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita, Filho", FCAV/UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo 14884-900, Brazil.
Juliano Cesar de Paula DorigamEvonik Nutrition & Care GmbH, Hanau, 63067, Hessen, Germany.
Kiran DoranalliEvonik Nutrition & Care GmbH, Hanau, 63067, Hessen, Germany.
Letícia SoaresDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita, Filho", FCAV/UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo 14884-900, Brazil.
Gabriel da Silva VianaDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita, Filho", FCAV/UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo 14884-900, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BREvonik (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A study was conducted to investigate the effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 as a direct-fed microbial (DFM) alone or in association with bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) in broilers under enteric pathogen challenge. A total of 1,530-day-old male Cobb500 chicks were randomly assigned to 5 treatments, with 9 replicate pens with 34 birds each. Treatments included positive control (PC, basal diet without additives or challenge); negative control (NC, basal diet without additive and challenged birds); NC + 0.05 g/kg BMD; NC + 1 g/kg DFM (106 CFU B. amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940/g of feed); and NC + 0.05 g/kg BMD + 1 g/kg DFM. The challenge consisted of oral gavage with Eimeria maxima and Clostridium perfringens inoculum. Body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were evaluated on days 21, 35, and 42. Ileal and cecal content were collected on days 21 and 28 for C. perfringens enumeration by real-time PCR assay and the intestinal health was evaluated by scores. Uniformity (UN), carcass (CY), and breast meat yields (BMY) were evaluated on day 42. After 14 and 21 d post-inoculation, birds in the challenged groups had significant lower FI and BWG compared to the PC group (P < 0.05). However, the groups receiving DFM, BMD, or its combination presented better FCR, CY, BMY, UN, and lower incidence of footpad lesion and litter quality visual scores, compared to the NC group without feed additives (P < 0.05). Mortality was not affected by treatments (P > 0.05). Broilers fed DFM, BMD, or its combination presented lower C. perfringens in ileal content at 21 and 28 d compared to NC group without additives (P < 0.05) and also maintained gut health by keeping the frequency of ballooning, abnormal content, and swollen mucosa comparable to the PC group (P > 0.05). The study indicates that Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 is effective as BMD to provide similar performance and gut health in challenged broilers.

Indexed as

ChickensAnimal FeedAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacillus amyloliquefaciensClostridium InfectionsClostridium perfringensCoccidiosisDietEimeriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGrowth SubstancesMaleMeatPoultry DiseasesProbioticsAnti-Bacterial AgentsGrowth SubstancesClostridium perfringensdirect-fed microbialEimeria maximanecrotic enteritisprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID31002111
PMCPMC6748725
OpenAlexW2935808427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.