Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31002049›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2019

Nipah Virus Sequences from Humans and Bats during Nipah Outbreak, Kerala, India, 2018.

Pragya D Yadav, Anita M Shete, G Arun Kumar, Prasad Sarkale, Rima R Sahay, Chandni Radhakrishnan, Rajen Lakra, Prachi Pardeshi, Nivedita Gupta, Raman R Gangakhedkar and 3 more

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Strengthening preparedness and response to emerging henipavirus diversity.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Molecular determinants of cross-species transmission in emerging viral infections.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pragya D Yadav
Anita M Shete
G Arun Kumar
Prasad Sarkale
Rima R Sahay
Chandni Radhakrishnan
Rajen Lakra
Prachi Pardeshi
Nivedita Gupta
Raman R Gangakhedkar
V R Rajendran
Rajeev Sadanandan
Devendra T Mourya

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We retrieved Nipah virus (NiV) sequences from 4 human and 3 fruit bat (Pteropus medius) samples from a 2018 outbreak in Kerala, India. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that NiV from humans was 96.15% similar to a Bangladesh strain but 99.7%-100% similar to virus from Pteropus spp. bats, indicating bats were the source of the outbreak.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksAnimalsCells, CulturedChiropteraCytopathogenic Effect, ViralHenipavirus InfectionsHistory, 21st CenturyHumansIndiaMutationNipah VirusPublic Health SurveillanceHumanIndiaKeralanext-generation sequencingNipah virusPteropus mediusqRT-PCRviruses

Identifiers

PMID31002049
PMCPMC6478210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.