ReviewPharmaceutical research2019
Challenges and Opportunities for Patient Centric Drug Product Design: Industry Perspectives.
Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Patient-Centric Formulation Compass: A Proposed Bottom-Up Framework to Translate Population Insights into Product Design.The AAPS journal · 2026Review
- Patient-Centric Long-Acting Injectable and Implantable Platforms─An Industrial Perspective.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Patient Involvement in the Design of an Innovative Clinical Study to Compare the Palatability of Anti-Hyperkalemia Medications.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Patient Acceptability and Preferences for Solid Oral Dosage Form Drug Product Attributes: A Scoping Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Better Medicines for Older Patients: Considerations between Patient Characteristics and Solid Oral Dosage Form Designs to Improve Swallowing Experience.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For an industry dedicated to preventing and treating disease, the concept of patient centric drug product design is remarkably new, yet it is beginning to transform medicinal development. The paternalistic paradigm of delivering efficacious and safe medicinal products, with inconsistent emphasis on patient centric considerations, is no longer sufficient. Patient expectations have evolved, and treatment use must complement patients' daily lives. While designing medicines to facilitate patients' use is now expected, the patient diversity across sub-populations and markets as well as industrial factors such as physicochemical properties, supply chain and shelf life aspects may preclude the development of a single, universal patient centric solution that meets all the needs of those with a particular disease. The objective of this publication is to highlight the complexities of implementing patient centric drug product design through a hypothetical HIV case study using the existing development and business processes to raise awareness and to suggest opportunities for collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31001717What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.