Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31001698›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2019

Evaluation of Demodex mite viability using motility and scattered light intensity.

S Gatault, R Foley, L Shiels, F C Powell

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S GataultCharles Institute of Dermatology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. solene.gatault@ucd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8887-8517
R FoleyCharles Institute of Dermatology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
L ShielsCharles Institute of Dermatology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
F C PowellCharles Institute of Dermatology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IE

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 666010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Demodex mites have been suggested to have a role in various cutaneous and ocular disorders pathogenesis, such as rosacea or blepharitis. Evaluation of potential treatments with anti-Demodex effects is difficult because the viability of living mites needs to be evaluated during their exposure to the agent being tested. Mite viability is currently based solely on their observed movement. However, this method of assessing viability has significant limitations as mites may be resting, immobile or paralysed at any given observation point giving the observer a false impression of the organism's death. To overcome this limitation we evaluated a new quantitative method of evaluating the viability of Demodex mites by using scattered light intensity (SLI). We demonstrated that when combined with observation of mite motility, SLI provided increased accuracy of the evaluation of viability of mites being studied. This new viability assay will help address the technical challenges of mite viability experiments. Accurate evaluation of mite viability will enhance mite biology research and allow for more accurate in vitro toxicity assays of proposed anti-mite agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsEntomologyLightMitesMovementBlepharitisDemodexDemodicosisRosaceaScaterred light intensityViability assay

Identifiers

PMID31001698
OpenAlexW2939254559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.