Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31001643›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2019

[Systematic surgery of retroperitoneal sarcomas : Imaging-guided planning of surgical strategy].

M Ghadimi, C J Bruns

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M GhadimiKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Tumorchirurgie, Uniklinikum Köln, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. markus.ghadimi@uk-koeln.de.
C J BrunsKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Tumorchirurgie, Uniklinikum Köln, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal and retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) represent approximately 25-30% of all soft tissue sarcomas, if besides typical retroperitoneal tumors gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are also included. The surgical R0 en bloc resection with histopathologically free margins is basically the only potentially curative treatment procedure. When planning the surgical strategy, the histopathological subtype and tumor localization are pivotal. The extent of resection should be guided by the goal to reach an en bloc resection with histopathologically negative margins. Due to the frequently found vast dimensions of RPS and ultimately topographic proximity to vital structures at primary diagnosis, R0 resections are not always achievable. Despite the introduction of multimodal treatment regimens and the development of standardized extended surgical procedures, such as systematic retroperitoneal compartmental resection (SRCR), local recurrences remain the most common cause of tumor-associated death. Finally, the results of the transatlantic RPS working group (TARPSWG) could show that treatment of RPS in specialized high-volume centers contributes to better long-term survival. Particularly in Germany there is an urgent demand for centralization of sarcoma patient treatment.

Indexed as

Retroperitoneal NeoplasmsSarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsGermanyHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesHistologyImagingRecurrenceResection marginsSystematic retroperitoneal compartmental resection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.