ReviewF1000Research2019
The impact of the open-access status on journal indices: a review of medical journals.
Review in F1000Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- Doctoral theses at the medical faculty of Tunis from 2015 to 2017: Scientific publication rates and associated factors.La Tunisie medicale · 2024Article
- Effects of open access publishing on article metrics in Neuropsychopharmacology.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Article
- Global research hotspots and trends on robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology: a bibliometric analysis based on VOSviewer.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Locating Medical Information during an Infodemic: Information Seeking Behavior and Strategies of Health-Care Workers in Germany.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Leading Transplantation Journals: A Trend Analysis, 2011-2021.Journal of transplantation · 2023Review
- Worldwide ophthalmological research production 2000-2020, with special focus on the Nordic contribution.Acta ophthalmologica · 2022Article
- Do open-access dermatology articles have higher citation counts than those with subscription-based access?PloS one · 2022Article
- Editorial: Transplant International Goes for GOLD!Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022Article
- Preserving the Open Access Benefits Pioneered by the Journal of Medical Internet Research and Discouraging Fraudulent Journals.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.