Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31001313›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019

Rare Variants Imputation in Admixed Populations: Comparison Across Reference Panels and Bioinformatics Tools.

Sanjeev Sariya, Joseph H Lee, Richard Mayeux, Badri N Vardarajan, Dolly Reyes-Dumeyer, Jennifer J Manly, Adam M Brickman, Rafael Lantigua, Martin Medrano, Ivonne Z Jimenez-Velazquez and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Strategies for the Genomic Analysis of Admixed Populations.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. False discovery rate control in genome-wide association studies with population structure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sanjeev SariyaTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Joseph H LeeTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Richard MayeuxTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Badri N VardarajanTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Dolly Reyes-DumeyerTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Jennifer J ManlyTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Adam M BrickmanTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Rafael LantiguaMedicine College of Physicians and Surgeons, and The Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Martin MedranoSchool of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica Madre y Maestra, Santiago, Dominican Republic.
Ivonne Z Jimenez-VelazquezDepartment of Medicine, Geriatrics Program, University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Giuseppe TostoTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

Genetic Epidemiology and Multi-Omics Analyses in Familial and Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease Among Secular Caribbean Hispanics and Religious OrderR01AG067501 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAYEUX, RICHARD P, MILLER, GARY W · 2020 to 2024
$11.7M
Genetic Epidemiology of Alzheimer's Disease in HispanicsR37AG015473 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAYEUX, RICHARD P · 2004 to 2013
$10.8M
Genetic Epidemiology of Cerebrovascular Factors in Alzheimer's DiseaseRF1AG054023 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAYEUX, RICHARD P · 2016 to 2018
$8.9M
Protective genetic factors of Alzheimer disease in PSEN1 Mutation Carriers in Puerto RicoR01AG058918 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LEE, JOSEPH HYUNGWOO · 2018 to 2022
$4.3M
Genetic Studies of Alzheimer's Disease in Caribbean HispanicsRF1AG015473 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAYEUX, RICHARD P · 2015 to 2018
$3.3M
Genetic Epidemiology and Multi-Omics Analyses in Familial and Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease Among Secular Caribbean Hispanics and Religious OrdersR56AG063908 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAYEUX, RICHARD P, MILLER, GARY W · 2019 to 2019
$2.3M
Genetic Modifiers of Alzheimer Disease in PSEN1 Mutation Carriers in Puerto RicoR56AG051876 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LEE, JOSEPH HYUNGWOO, MAYEUX, RICHARD P · 2016 to 2016
$842k
Admixture mapping in late-onset Alzheimer’s diseaseR21AG054832 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI TOSTO, GIUSEPPE · 2016 to 2017
$440k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG058918NIA NIH HHS R01 AG067501NIA NIH HHS R21 AG054832NIA NIH HHS R37 AG015473NIA NIH HHS R56 AG051876NIA NIH HHS R56 AG063908NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG015473NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG054023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImputation has become a standard approach in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to infer

methodsWe evaluated imputation accuracy in CH (

resultsSHAPEIT2 retrieved higher percentage of imputed high-quality variants than Eagle2 (rare: 51.02% vs. 48.60%; ultra-rare 0.66% vs. 0.65%, Wilcoxon

conclusionReference panels with larger numbers of haplotypes can improve imputation quality for rare and ultra-rare variants in admixed populations such as CH. Ethnic composition is an important predictor of imputation accuracy, with higher African ancestry associated with poorer imputation accuracy.

Indexed as

1000Gadmixed populationGWASimputationrare variants

Identifiers

PMID31001313
PMCPMC6456789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.