Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31001246›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2019

Mast Cells in Cardiac Fibrosis: New Insights Suggest Opportunities for Intervention.

Stephanie A Legere, Ian D Haidl, Jean-François Légaré, Jean S Marshall

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Identification of anoikis-related biomarkers linking immune infiltration to acute myocardial infarction.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The immunology of diabetic cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. p16Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Mast Cells in Cardiac Remodeling: Focus on the Right Ventricle.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie A LegereDepartments of Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Ian D HaidlDepartments of Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Jean-François LégaréDepartment of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Jean S MarshallDepartments of Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CASaint John Regional Hospital · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mast cells (MC) are innate immune cells present in virtually all body tissues with key roles in allergic disease and host defense. MCs recognize damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) through expression of multiple receptors including Toll-like receptors and the IL-33 receptor ST2. MCs can be activated to degranulate and release pre-formed mediators, to synthesize and secrete cytokines and chemokines without degranulation, and/or to produce lipid mediators. MC numbers are generally increased at sites of fibrosis. They are potent, resident, effector cells producing mediators that regulate the fibrotic process. The nature of the secretory products produced by MCs depend on micro-environmental signals and can be both pro- and anti-fibrotic. MCs have been repeatedly implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiac fibrosis and in angiogenic responses in hypoxic tissues, but these findings are controversial. Several rodent studies have indicated a protective role for MCs. MC-deficient mice have been reported to have poorer outcomes after coronary artery ligation and increased cardiac function upon MC reconstitution. In contrast, MCs have also been implicated as key drivers of fibrosis. MC stabilization during a hypertensive rat model and an atrial fibrillation mouse model rescued associated fibrosis. Discrepancies in the literature could be related to problems with mouse models of MC deficiency. To further complicate the issue, mice generally have a much lower density of MCs in their cardiac tissue than humans, and as such comparing MC deficient and MC containing mouse models is not necessarily reflective of the role of MCs in human disease. In this review, we will evaluate the literature regarding the role of MCs in cardiac fibrosis with an emphasis on what is known about MC biology, in this context. MCs have been well-studied in allergic disease and multiple pharmacological tools are available to regulate their function. We will identify potential opportunities to manipulate human MC function and the impact of their mediators with a view to preventing or reducing harmful fibrosis. Important therapeutic opportunities could arise from increased understanding of the impact of such potent, resident immune cells, with the ability to profoundly alter long term fibrotic processes.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAnimalsFibrosisHumansInterleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 ProteinInterleukin-33Mast CellsMiceMyocardial IschemiaNeovascularization, PathologicRatsRats, Inbred SHRToll-Like ReceptorsIL1RL1 protein, humanIL33 protein, humanInterleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 ProteinInterleukin-33Toll-Like Receptorscardiac fibrosisimmunologyinflammationmast celltissue remodeling

Identifiers

PMID31001246
PMCPMC6455071
OpenAlexW2919852644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.