Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31001064›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental neuroscience2019

Insights Into Traumatic Brain Injury From MRI of Harmonic Brain Motion.

Ruth J Okamoto, Anthony J Romano, Curtis L Johnson, Philip V Bayly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rapid, non-invasive,Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Group characterization of impact-induced,Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ruth J OkamotoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Anthony J RomanoAcoustics Division, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA.
Curtis L JohnsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7760-131X
Philip V BaylyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4303-0704
Washington University in St. Louis · USUnited States Naval Research Laboratory · USUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

IN VIVO MEASUREMENT OF BRAIN BIOMECHANICSR01NS055951 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAYLY, PHILIP V · 2007 to 2017
$3.9M
In Vivo Measurement of Brain BiomechanicsR56NS055951 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAYLY, PHILIP V · 2018 to 2018
$563k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055951NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS055951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurements of dynamic deformation of the human brain, induced by external harmonic vibration of the skull, were analyzed to illuminate the mechanics of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Shear wave propagation velocity vector fields were obtained to illustrate the role of the skull and stiff internal membranes in transmitting motion to the brain. Relative motion between the cerebrum and cerebellum was quantified to assess the vulnerability of connecting structures. Mechanical deformation was quantified throughout the brain to investigate spatial patterns of strain and axonal stretch. Strain magnitude was generally attenuated as shear waves propagated into interior structures of the brain; this attenuation was greater at higher frequencies. Analysis of shear wave propagation direction indicates that the stiff membranes (falx and tentorium) greatly affect brain deformation during imposed skull motion as they serve as sites for both initiation and reflection of shear waves. Relative motion between the cerebellum and cerebrum was small in comparison with the overall motion of both structures, which suggests that such relative motion might play only a minor role in TBI mechanics. Strain magnitudes and the amount of axonal stretch near the bases of sulci were similar to those in other areas of the cortex, and local strain concentrations at the gray-white matter boundary were not observed. We tentatively conclude that observed differences in neuropathological response in these areas might be due to heterogeneity in the response to mechanical deformation rather than heterogeneity of the deformation itself.

Indexed as

brain mechanicsbrain-skull interfacechronic traumatic encephalopathyMR elastographyTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID31001064
PMCPMC6454654
OpenAlexW2939778852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.