ArticleJournal of mid-life health
A Clinical Study of a Standardized Extract of Leaves of
Article in Journal of mid-life health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nobiletin-loaded micelles reduce ovariectomy-induced bone loss by suppressing osteoclastogenesis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2019Article
- A Convergent and Multidisciplinary Integration for Research in Menopause.Journal of mid-life healthArticle
- Report: Council for Ayurveda Research - Industry Roundtable and Global Consortium for Collaborative Research in Ayurveda, 2021.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
context
aimsTo investigate the anti-osteoporotic activity of SETTINGS AND
designAn open-labeled prospective clinical study in ambulant settings was conducted at the menopausal health-care facility of a women's hospital. MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty women (45-69 years) were enrolled for this 1-year study. Evaluations were basally, fortnightly twice, and three monthly four times. SEL-Ds (300 mg) twice daily was administered orally. Calcium (250 mg) and Vitamin D (200 IU) were given twice a day. The efficacy of SEL-Ds was assessed by DXA-scan (spine, femur), by biochemical markers, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and anti-inflammatory marker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). Baseline symptom changes and adverse events were carefully recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Summary statistics (n, mean, standard deviation, median, and maximum and minimum values) of changes from baseline values and Student's "t-" test for RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: SEL-Ds was well tolerated at given dose for 1 year. Anti-osteoporotic and anti-inflammatory activities of SEL-Ds were demonstrated by reduction in TNF-α (12.04 ± 2.81-2.35 ± 1.08 pg/ml), ALP (208.75 ± 45.88-154.52 ± 37.25 IU/L), and hs-CRP (6.1 ± 0.77-3.9 ± 0.47 mg/L). BMD-score on DXA-scan also remained unchanged at majority of the bone locations (increased 13/75, unchanged 51/75, and decreased 08/75).
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.